RE: [Ltru] Re: action item: "other" collections in 639

Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com> Tue, 08 January 2008 16:29 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JCHKc-0002To-CU; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 11:29:38 -0500
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JCHKa-00022v-BS for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 11:29:36 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JCHKY-0001yw-HT for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 11:29:34 -0500
Received: from mailc.microsoft.com ([131.107.115.214] helo=smtp.microsoft.com) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JCHKY-0007l6-25 for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 11:29:34 -0500
Received: from TK5-EXHUB-C101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.70.76) by TK5-EXGWY-E803.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.169) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.222.3; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 08:29:33 -0800
Received: from NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.62.46]) by TK5-EXHUB-C101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.70.76]) with mapi; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 08:29:33 -0800
From: Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 08:29:31 -0800
Subject: RE: [Ltru] Re: action item: "other" collections in 639
Thread-Topic: [Ltru] Re: action item: "other" collections in 639
Thread-Index: AchRvuoDLB1wBeaeQVGgGTIXfLcsuAAVHh1A
Message-ID: <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579561E62F18C7@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <E1JC1mZ-0006LU-MT@megatron.ietf.org> <001901c851b6$9ed84350$6501a8c0@DGBP7M81> <20080108062252.GF27859@mercury.ccil.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080108062252.GF27859@mercury.ccil.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

> From: John Cowan

> > Am I correct in thinking the group will want to delay 4645bis again
> for
> > this?
>
> I don't see why.  It has no structural effect, and it's just a matter
> of 34 name changes later.

I agree: there's no reason for delaying 4646bis for this, unless someone thinks we need some text somewhere pertaining to collections or stability that could not take effect until the change is made in ISO 639-2.



Peter


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru