RE: [Ltru] Re: matching comments: use of prefixes

"Addison Phillips" <addison.phillips@quest.com> Fri, 30 September 2005 03:07 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ELBFO-00024d-LI; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 23:07:42 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ELBFN-00024Y-2J for ltru@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 23:07:41 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA01561 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 23:07:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from irvmbxw02.quest.com ([12.106.87.68] helo=irvbhxw02.quest.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ELBN4-0008J7-VR for ltru@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 23:15:41 -0400
Received: from IRVPFXW01.prod.quest.corp ([10.1.2.202]) by irvbhxw02.quest.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:07:22 -0700
Received: from alvmbxw01.prod.quest.corp ([10.1.50.13]) by IRVPFXW01.prod.quest.corp with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:07:21 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Ltru] Re: matching comments: use of prefixes
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:06:56 -0700
Message-ID: <FA13712B13469646A618BC95F7E1BA8F135592@alvmbxw01.prod.quest.corp>
Thread-Topic: [Ltru] Re: matching comments: use of prefixes
thread-index: AcXFZ8ZSO/Y5/4sbQTKN5qVuFWk9kQABB+Hw
From: Addison Phillips <addison.phillips@quest.com>
To: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>, ltru@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Sep 2005 03:07:21.0981 (UTC) FILETIME=[133CAAD0:01C5C56C]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d0bdc596f8dd1c226c458f0b4df27a88
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc:
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

In the first case, I caught the problem when inserting into the editor's copy. It is clearly not 2119 language. In the second case, I think it ought to be (although it is borderline).

Addison

Addison P. Phillips
Globalization Architect, Quest Software
Chair, W3C Internationalization Core Working Group

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ltru-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Randy Presuhn
> Sent: jeudi 29 septembre 2005 19:39
> To: ltru@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: matching comments: use of prefixes
> 
> Hi -
> 
> > From: "Addison Phillips" <addison.phillips@quest.com>
> > To: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>; <ltru@ietf.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 3:44 PM
> > Subject: RE: [Ltru] Re: matching comments: use of prefixes
> ...
> > --
> > Users should note that the set of language tags that match a specific
> > language-range MAY NOT be mutually intelligible, although historically
> > this form of matching has proven useful.
> > --
> 
> This is clearly NOT an RFC 2119 "MAY NOT".  Please replace with "may not"
> or "might not".
> 
> ...
> > <t>Users SHOULD avoid subtags that add no distinguishing value to a
> language range.
> >  For example, script subtags SHOULD NOT be used to form a language range
> with
> ...
> 
> This SHOULD and SHOULD NOT are borderline.  I think they're ok (since
> they're about operational considerations), but it would not surprise me if
> others, pickier that I (you know who you are) object.  I suggest:
> 
>    Users are advised to avoid subtags that...
>    For example,  no distinguishing value is normally added by including a
>    subtag matching a language tag's Suppress-Script field from its
>    registry record.  Thus...
> 
> Now, if we were talking about what decisions implementations should make,
> there's a stronger case for SHOULD.
> 
> Randy
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru