Re: [Ltru] Re: John Cowan throws in the towel on extlangs

John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> Fri, 14 December 2007 20:11 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J3Gs8-0005G6-WE; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:11:01 -0500
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J3Gs7-0005Fa-Cy for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:10:59 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J3Gs7-0005FP-2H for ltru@ietf.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:10:59 -0500
Received: from earth.ccil.org ([192.190.237.11]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J3Gs6-0000Oj-PM for ltru@ietf.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:10:58 -0500
Received: from cowan by earth.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <cowan@ccil.org>) id 1J3Gs6-0000Vh-50; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:10:58 -0500
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:10:58 -0500
To: Karen_Broome@spe.sony.com
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: John Cowan throws in the towel on extlangs
Message-ID: <20071214201058.GG15079@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <20071214044213.GI29729@mercury.ccil.org> <OF75781F2E.A97F26F3-ON882573B1.006022FB-882573B1.006154B9@spe.sony.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <OF75781F2E.A97F26F3-ON882573B1.006022FB-882573B1.006154B9@spe.sony.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906
Cc: ltru@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Karen_Broome@spe.sony.com scripsit:

> Is the situation any different for Cantonese language?  Most Cantonese 
> documents and speech are tagged zh or zh-yue. If you deprecate "zh", it 
> might not be helpful for written language, but it's a necessity to have 
> two separate tags for tagged spoken language. With the explosion of online 
> video, tagged audio content is increasing.

1) zh is not being deprecated.

2) zh-yue is being deprecated in favor of plain yue.

3) zh-cmn is being deprecated in favor of cmn.

4) People should think twice about using cmn rather than plain zh.

I think that's a fair summary.

-- 
I marvel at the creature: so secret and         John Cowan
so sly as he is, to come sporting in the pool   cowan@ccil.org
before our very window.  Does he think that     http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Men sleep without watch all night?


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru