Re: [Ltru] draft-davis-t-langtag-ext

"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Thu, 21 July 2011 10:15 UTC

Return-Path: <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ltru@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC1421F88B7 for <ltru@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 03:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.817
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.817 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.027, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MxwTiJMsLjtM for <ltru@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 03:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from acintmta01.acbb.aoyama.ac.jp (acintmta01.acbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.20.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2195621F8591 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 03:15:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from acmse01.acbb.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.20.226]) by acintmta01.acbb.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id p6LAFFnf028500 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 19:15:15 +0900
Received: from (unknown [133.2.206.133]) by acmse01.acbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 126d_37bc_53cb15ae_b382_11e0_8ad4_001d096c5b62; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 19:15:15 +0900
Received: from [IPv6:::1] ([133.2.210.5]:33486) by itmail.it.aoyama.ac.jp with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id <S1531997> for <ltru@ietf.org> from <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 19:15:18 +0900
Message-ID: <4E27FC02.2000101@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 19:14:26 +0900
From: =?UTF-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiBKLiBEw7xyc3Qi?= <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org>
References: <20110707140047.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.487d506b5f.wbe@email03.secureserver.net>
In-Reply-To: <20110707140047.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.487d506b5f.wbe@email03.secureserver.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf-languages@iana.org, ltru@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ltru] draft-davis-t-langtag-ext
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:15:16 -0000

On 2011/07/08 6:00, Doug Ewell wrote:
> Pete Resnick<presnick at qualcomm dot com>  wrote:

> I'm concerned that all of the procedures for assigning field values
> adopted in RFC 6067 are being taken as a precedent for this draft as
> well.  The assignments are solely up to the CLDR committee, and there is
> no public announcement or notification that a change has been made or
> why a request was rejected.  It could be argued that the -u- mechanism
> was really only meant for CLDR-type usage; no such argument can be made
> for the -t- mechanism.

I agree with Doug.

> I can't find any indication of where within CLDR the list of allowable
> values will be located.  Saying they're in core.zip is almost useless.
> Saying they're in common/bcp47 is better, but I'd still like to know
> what file name, what XML element, etc.  An example would help.

Agreed here again.

Regards,   Martin.