Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang

"Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com> Thu, 29 May 2008 00:23 UTC

Return-Path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ltru-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ltru-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF513A6CD3; Wed, 28 May 2008 17:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD92D3A68B0 for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 May 2008 17:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4hE67B+wpKxq for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 May 2008 17:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.65]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2753A6CFF for <ltru@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 May 2008 17:21:51 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=n4MzHvwOznhHvBixUtUMMmMe70/N7nMYxNBHvKbnbHtcwHuwkM/T/NUINKjfgLgF; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [68.166.37.40] (helo=oemcomputer) by elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>) id 1K1Vu2-0005Np-2E for ltru@ietf.org; Wed, 28 May 2008 20:21:58 -0400
Message-ID: <001f01c8c122$0cbcae80$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
From: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
References: <01c301c8bbe5$8c2810c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <008a01c8bedc$72b97b20$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <30b660a20805252132g28ff50b0kd5b04d6f47ca35d2@mail.gmail.com> <002001c8bef3$e0497520$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <6.0.0.20.2.20080527170755.05bd89c0@localhost> <002f01c8c024$0dcdb5c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <6.0.0.20.2.20080528163346.074fac80@localhost>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 17:22:15 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478
X-ELNK-Trace: 4488c18417c9426da92b9037bc8bcf44d4c20f6b8d69d888a63b7957ab9b23b307326e262d78d4d50f65802736663681350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 68.166.37.40
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Hi -

Martin and I double-checked the tally, and it turns out that
*two* responses were sent directly to me, rather  than to the
ltru@ietf.org mailing list.  One was sent after the deadline.
Here's the tally including those three:

Q1: A-4 B-9 C-4
Q2: A-8 B-5 C-4

Excluding those three responses, it looks like:
Q1: A-2 B-9 C-3
Q2: A-7  B-5 C-2

Either way, the support for an extlang-less approach appears to
be in he distinct minority, and there appears to be a marked
preference (which we'll call a *rough* consensus) for
"reinstating" extlang.

Or have a bunch of people changed their minds?

Randy


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru