IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ltru] Fwd: draft-davis-t-langtag-ext

Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh@htpassport.com> Thu, 07 July 2011 21:45 UTC

Return-Path: <roozbeh@htpassport.com>
X-Original-To: ltru@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476999E8035 for <ltru@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 14:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.933
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.933 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.666, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JQVag4s8vLfE for <ltru@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 14:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.htpassport.net (mx2.htpassport.net [173.13.187.84]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24609E8031 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 14:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.htpassport.net (HTP_ESMTP) with ESMTP id 764C8AFA804; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 14:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at htpassport.com
Received: from [192.168.0.40] (unknown [192.168.0.40]) by mx2.htpassport.net (HTP_ESMTP) with ESMTP id 1ABDBAFA802; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 14:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh@htpassport.com>
To: Debbie Garside <debbie@ictmarketing.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <07de01cc3cea$c0b56930$42203b90$@co.uk>
References: <4E14F473.6030101@qualcomm.com> <4E152E4F.9070203@gmail.com> <CAJ2xs_Fm0NLOyL6PLps=77mb=o-gU2cCvi0=i0nj6NQJ01qnVw@mail.gmail.com> <075f01cc3cbf$0f04ba90$2d0e2fb0$@co.uk> <CAJ2xs_ED6pmF=t=0g9G5fUJH8GyM8X+G=_juC93uuw0JHtcsJQ@mail.gmail.com> <07be01cc3ce6$114dfc90$33e9f5b0$@co.uk> <1310071653.2702.3.camel@tehran.htpassport.net> <07de01cc3cea$c0b56930$42203b90$@co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Organization: HighTech Passport
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 14:45:51 -0700
Message-ID: <1310075151.2702.9.camel@tehran.htpassport.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 (2.32.2-1.fc14)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 20:07:17 -0700
Cc: 'Pete Resnick' <presnick@qualcomm.com>, 'CLDR list' <cldr@unicode.org>, 'LTRU Working Group' <ltru@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Fwd: draft-davis-t-langtag-ext
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 21:45:54 -0000

On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 22:13 +0100, Debbie Garside wrote:
> But I still don't see why it needs to be taken out of IETF.  Where is
> the added value?  Where are discussions held?  Why create another list
> when we already have IETF-languages?

My understanding is that you are not objecting to the Unicode Consortium
registering authority for a BCP 47 extension subtag, but you are
objecting to BCP 47 section 3.7, right? You basically want to change BCP
47 section 3.7 to have more restrictions on the extension subtag
registering authorities, right?

Roozbeh

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email