IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ltru] RFC4645 to Historic status

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Tue, 05 September 2023 17:45 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ltru@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4550DC151711 for <ltru@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 10:45:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QyLRzSYxcd1w for <ltru@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 10:45:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x230.google.com (mail-lj1-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BA19C15155A for <ltru@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 10:45:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x230.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2be4bc1ae53so5596221fa.0 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Sep 2023 10:45:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1693935929; x=1694540729; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ReUDhxIJQyi5vMiEYxA5vRE9yQees0CNo7AMXpd9vMQ=; b=hF0GlPM1gITVv/VxkvhJlSVQDOdO7BanMHV1gzNszow66BDAZCM4G2y1+1mGxonpQ1 JI0NYFGt6EBXv1At5TNXR1WlANGoF5QeNxr5sBMLq68xpNgJStMy3Ow1TI7+RaF2jfqK T3aWZz3+pcb6oDKdNsl/KS1JbJ1G/pu+dmOPnRoSW94zozWfIy1ySQaJogqqvt+qr16Z XTl5jfPaTEej19QDYLjC5O/52CIwEonLSZC2I1SDa8tqvszRzlP+PxGgWApBvaMOhAHp Bxpmsr2kJjQ9jAcZ51sMj9K+LWS5XbI45QXwltFsZhs/d1/fZiswpxdlOL6gzxla909Z 8ZHg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1693935929; x=1694540729; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=ReUDhxIJQyi5vMiEYxA5vRE9yQees0CNo7AMXpd9vMQ=; b=Xmp4ADTvrAdmZYwvZdpH2vnB9V5lRPOUIsEiSNU75imPrEPNZ/f80kqMXEi6CD/m6d hZWsTgJRdljN6RI522r6q72zRO6fl8NYrDcwatlQg2nGLEisMFJTOswvhikGF919JsIx Xj5adpmrRewjhtADlKppPi/KtFd7VVWfN9C1W4eIFHyk7BxaIkWVUvDqyz4/BB2UVIff 8M9imHXVklhCny2uAvhrW4cE6v7luxGoH66h3OvkJM4V7fKdNf3glsWD/4WpYqGdgviB 7tjkTiVp/RhRxwn8FJl9ghjGo9i78XvYBtrnXqEW3NlU7iPGjdnkXTfoM0yryr06n8RF YCHw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxn9+9eYuH2Tvog3bSCg6MGWSe/QVPCQPFoVPRDJIOKMpJtTyxg OEaGyXzvMi93lGxB1wsTmympKG6QT6AN5IR5j6g=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEHashZmUSD/Ln9nHkCK3ebMg7BVYwYjjiyQS3jraMkyr07v5bQIsg9rAOYTpopB3eHkcQf58QWKNRRcJD4ATk=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:1415:0:b0:2bc:fc2e:766c with SMTP id u21-20020a2e1415000000b002bcfc2e766cmr7983231ljd.3.1693935928919; Tue, 05 Sep 2023 10:45:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <mailman.79.1692212403.2397.ltru@ietf.org> <SJ0PR03MB6598363502C6A1BE8396FEF6CA1AA@SJ0PR03MB6598.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <516549640.3380391.1692310263006@email.ionos.com> <SJ0PR03MB65989AA736D9D1B92161CCB0CA1AA@SJ0PR03MB6598.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <723189438.3387115.1692312008380@email.ionos.com> <SJ0PR03MB6598D695F55085A47BC932E8CA1AA@SJ0PR03MB6598.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <1319152096.906754.1693332108616@email.ionos.com> <SJ0PR03MB6598BF87667F15857328CC7ECAE7A@SJ0PR03MB6598.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAL0qLwYovamEYRSDttam7HkEQCDXQ+F-oSr_Pi8oNpqpnH_z-Q@mail.gmail.com> <460538773.209462.1693444853594@email.ionos.com> <CAL0qLwboUWzUsdna65mR1gAg12DqiCTV1xJ4udcdsPTbOpNaZQ@mail.gmail.com> <127541546.300742.1693472589908@email.ionos.com> <fa34a2df-3a0a-29d6-b646-b82b7d41df1c@alumni.stanford.edu> <SJ0PR03MB6598DFE8FB085574FD474AD6CAE8A@SJ0PR03MB6598.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <SJ0PR03MB6598DFE8FB085574FD474AD6CAE8A@SJ0PR03MB6598.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2023 10:45:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwaE=uoO6n_HGhcQ2nSJvwQ_v+M9pPEAzOssCqPei4X6=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org>
Cc: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@alumni.stanford.edu>, Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>, "ltru@ietf.org" <ltru@ietf.org>, "randy_presuhn@mindspring.com" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>, "francesca.palombini@ericsson.com" <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, "rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000050cdfd0604a0314e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ltru/jbIYb1WJ7K-omRemYkfV3JNFwyg>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] RFC4645 to Historic status
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ltru/>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2023 17:45:32 -0000

On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 8:55 PM Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org> wrote:

> [...]
>
> What *is* wrong is the presentation of items on the Protocol Registries
> page. Items 1 and 5 above are obsolete and need to be moved to a separate,
> clearly marked "Obsolete" section, or removed altogether. But once again,
> and hopefully once and for all, this is neither a past nor a present error
> in RFC 4645.
>
> I am willing to explain all this again to whoever at IANA is in charge of
> maintaining that page.
>

I'm happy to loop IANA into this directly, or turn it into an IESG
instruction to IANA, if this is something people think is worth doing. If
so then yes, Doug or Randy, please just give me a set of instructions to
pass on to them.

In any case, I'll reject the erratum shortly unless someone stops me.

-MSK, ART AD

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status