DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta;
 h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth;
 b=Dmo26kcvUjRug9hlQhSH1egMYGMzMe1JewLsuZYNVJQp9Z7e5AtLrnkXrdK6tE4MJLQ/qT0ce25PCMUW9otXQUh0L8XXBbKkBAZNaJfHzmEnXSTlMSStyRb635L4FlDgq70Lw5FK2M+MD00pdZ9o3lWyR2tLiiskeA+bhh5qR1s=
Message-ID: <30b660a20707031446p4a9f3b2bn6a0e8fd5fcb596c3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:46:11 -0700
From: "Mark Davis" <mark.davis@icu-project.org>
To: "Stephane Bortzmeyer" <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20070703212319.GA29518@sources.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <30b660a20707031353g6fe6496dhe1851f99678cf2c5@mail.gmail.com>
 <20070703212319.GA29518@sources.org>
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
Subject: [Ltru] Re: Announcement text
Precedence: list
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1385584752=="
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

--===============1385584752==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
 boundary="----=_Part_161382_18129868.1183499171869"

------=_Part_161382_18129868.1183499171869
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Everybody has and can use email, so I don't think using a different
mechanism that not everyone is set up to use would be the best choice.

Mark

On 7/3/07, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 01:53:51PM -0700,
> Mark Davis <mark.davis@icu-project.org> wrote
> a message of 55 lines which said:
>
> > When any change is made to the language subtag registry, IANA MUST
> > send an announcement message to ietf-languages-announcements@
> > iana.org
>
> I am very reluctant here. Why mandating a given technique, email,
> while Atom might be preferred by some?
>
>


-- 
Mark

------=_Part_161382_18129868.1183499171869
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Everybody has and can use email, so I don&#39;t think using a different mechanism that not everyone is set up to use would be the best choice.<br><br>Mark<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 7/3/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">
Stephane Bortzmeyer</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:bortzmeyer@nic.fr">bortzmeyer@nic.fr</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 01:53:51PM -0700,<br> Mark Davis &lt;<a href="mailto:mark.davis@icu-project.org">mark.davis@icu-project.org</a>&gt; wrote<br> a message of 55 lines which said:<br><br>&gt; When any change is made to the language subtag registry, IANA MUST
<br>&gt; send an announcement message to ietf-languages-announcements@<br>&gt; <a href="http://iana.org">iana.org</a><br><br>I am very reluctant here. Why mandating a given technique, email,<br>while Atom might be preferred by some?
<br><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Mark

------=_Part_161382_18129868.1183499171869--



--===============1385584752==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

--===============1385584752==--