[Ltru] Re: Macrolanguage and extlang

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Mon, 16 July 2007 09:33 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IAMxh-0007CM-NZ; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:33:49 -0400
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IAMxg-0007CE-UL for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:33:48 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IAMxg-0007C6-Kp for ltru@ietf.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:33:48 -0400
Received: from mx2.nic.fr ([192.134.4.11]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IAMxc-0003lZ-BT for ltru@ietf.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:33:48 -0400
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 048EC1C00DA; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:33:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002DA1C0092; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:33:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [192.134.4.69]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69FD58ECAE; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:33:43 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:33:43 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Doug Ewell <dewell@roadrunner.com>
Message-ID: <20070716093343.GD9841@nic.fr>
References: <E1I9ghp-0006L9-0h@megatron.ietf.org> <013b01c7c6a8$55cb4a20$6401a8c0@DGBP7M81>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <013b01c7c6a8$55cb4a20$6401a8c0@DGBP7M81>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 4.0
X-Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686 i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
Subject: [Ltru] Re: Macrolanguage and extlang
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 11:21:09PM -0700,
 Doug Ewell <dewell@roadrunner.com> wrote 
 a message of 28 lines which said:

> It is certainly not as bad as some of the alternatives that were
> mentioned, such as an "Encompasses:" field with 30 or 40
> comma-separated language subtags.  We have to decide on something
> and move along.

Speaking as someone who likes databases, I can say it seems better to
have the information in the "encompassed language" record rather than
in the "macrolanguage" record. That way, adding a record will not
require to modify *another* record.





_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru