Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang

[Felix Sasaki <[e-mail]>]

Q1: B
Q2: A

Felix

Randy Presuhn さんは書きました:
> Hi -
>
> As co-chair...
>
> Later in this message I will be asking some questions.  Please
> respond to this mailing list so that the co-chairs can decide
> what to instruct the editors to do regarding the general disposition
> (*not* detailed wordsmithing!) of the extlang question.
>
> Please respond no later than Saturday, May 24th, wherever you are.
> Please DO NOT respond to others' responses.
> If you feel compelled to include a rationale with your response,
> PLEASE keep it down to a single brief sentence, and don't expect
> anyone to respond to it.  If you want a conversation, start a
> new thread!
>
> We've discussed this quite enough.  About 600 messages have been
> posted this month on this list, mostly on this topic.  After wading
> through this mass, I'm quite convinced that while further wordsmithing
> (of whatever solution we agree to) will be needed, the arguments for
> and against each of the approaches were made quite some time ago.
> There are conflicting considerations and analyses, and it's clear
> to me there's no perfect answer that will make everyone happy.
>
> Q1: The current draft (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-14.txt)
>     does away with the "extlang" production. Possible responses: (pick ONE)
>         A - I like this.
>         B - I can live with this.
>         C - I object to this.   
>
> Q2: We could go back to using "extlang" in the grammar, requiring its
>     use for representing "encompassed" languages that are being added.
>     Possible responses:  (pick ONE)
>         A - I would like this.
>         B - I could live with this.
>         C - I would object to this.
>
> Randy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
>   

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru