Re: [Ltru] Re: Suggested language for "mis"

+2. I'll put that in the draft when I sit down with it again (later 
today??).

Incidentally, I'm preparing to submit draft-07.

Addison

Frank Ellermann wrote:
> Randy Presuhn wrote:
> 
>>> The 'mis' (Uncoded) primary language subtag SHOULD NOT be used. According to
>>> ISO 639, it is used to identify linguistic content whose language is known
>>> but which does not *currently* have a corresponding subtag. It is thus
>>> intrinsically unstable -- the addition of other codes in the future can
>>> render its application invalid at any point without any warning -- and hence
>>> incompatible with the stability goals of BCP 47. It is thus always
>>> preferable to use other subtags: either "und" or -- with prior agreement --
>>> private use subtags.
>> ...
> 
>> As a technical contributor, I rather like this proposal.
> 
> +1,
> no need to discuss MARC and other good excuses to violate the SHOULD NOT.
> 
> Frank
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

-- 
Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect -- Yahoo! Inc.
Chair -- W3C Internationalization Core WG

Internationalization is an architecture.
It is not a feature.

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru