Re: [Ltru] Punjabi

<sukhjinder_sidhu@hotmail.com> Wed, 14 March 2007 23:20 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HRcln-00071Z-LU; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:20:35 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HRcac-0001Ah-LZ for ltru@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:09:02 -0400
Received: from bay0-omc1-s30.bay0.hotmail.com ([65.54.246.102]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HRcaY-00086H-Ai for ltru@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:09:02 -0400
Received: from hotmail.com ([207.46.8.15]) by bay0-omc1-s30.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:08:57 -0700
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:08:57 -0700
Message-ID: <BAY117-DAV52A3B41E035AF4F2A5B45E8730@phx.gbl>
Received: from 87.194.38.9 by BAY117-DAV5.phx.gbl with DAV; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 23:08:55 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [87.194.38.9]
X-Originating-Email: [sukhjinder_sidhu@hotmail.com]
X-Sender: sukhjinder_sidhu@hotmail.com
From: sukhjinder_sidhu@hotmail.com
To: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
References: <BAY117-W1545194BA616EBFE84087CE8730@phx.gbl> <20070314222951.GQ1509@mercury.ccil.org>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Punjabi
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 23:08:39 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail desktop 8.0.1226
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V8.0.1226
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Mar 2007 23:08:57.0856 (UTC) FILETIME=[BEA9A800:01C7668D]
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 5a9a1bd6c2d06a21d748b7d0070ddcb8
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:20:34 -0400
Cc: rick@unicode.org, Nayyara Karamat <nayyara.karamat@nu.edu.pk>, "Sarmad Hussain, Dr." <sarmad.hussain@nu.edu.pk>, iso639-2@loc.gov, LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>, Abbas Malik <abbas.malik@gmail.com>, iso639-3@sil.org
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

[Sorry for the duplicate mail]

I have actually managed to track down some relevant information from the LSI
faster than I originally thought:

Lahnda in the LSI:

http://www.joao-roiz.jp/cgi-bin/f_LSI_mkpdf.cgi?v=8-1&ff=255&ft=255&TID=7d3770e568052ed9d2e25ba27e29950f

Punjabi in the LSI:

http://www.rosettaproject.org/archive/pan/detail-1/?b_start:int=1&page_view=image_view


Please keep in mind that this is about 100 years old, and was made during 
the British Raj prior to partition.  The dynamics of the area may have 
changes now.

Regards,
Sukhjinder

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Cowan" <cowan@ccil.org>
To: "Sukhjinder Sidhu" <sukhjinder_sidhu@hotmail.com>
Cc: "Mark Davis" <mark.davis@icu-project.org>; "Sarmad Hussain, Dr." 
<sarmad.hussain@nu.edu.pk>; "LTRU Working Group" <ltru@ietf.org>; "Nayyara 
Karamat" <nayyara.karamat@nu.edu.pk>; <iso639-2@loc.gov>; 
<rick@unicode.org>; <iso639-3@sil.org>; "Abbas Malik" 
<abbas.malik@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 10:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Punjabi

> Sukhjinder Sidhu scripsit:
>
>> I personally think we should keep both pa-IN (pa-Guru), pa-PK (pa-Arab)
>> for standard Punjabi, while allowing for the Lahnda languages (Hindko,
>> Seraiki etc) to be defined later with their own language codes.
>
> Well, we have two standards to harmonize.  One provides two distinct
> names (and code elements), "Panjabi" and "Lahnda".  The other provides
> the names "Eastern Panjabi", "Western Panjabi", "Mirpur Panjabi",
> "Jakati", "Khetrani", "Northern Hindko", "Southern Hindko", "Seraiki",
> and "Pahari-Potwari".  The question is, how shall the 9 names of 639-3
> be mapped onto the 2 names of 639-2?
>
> The current plan is to map "Eastern Panjabi" onto "Panjabi", and all
> the others onto "Lahnda".  It sounds like you are proposing to map
> both "Eastern Panjabi" and "Western Panjabi" onto "Panjabi"
> and the others onto "Lahnda".  Is that correct?
>
> -- 
> While staying with the Asonu, I met a man from      John Cowan
> the Candensian plane, which is very much like       cowan@ccil.org
> ours, only more of it consists of Toronto. 
> http://:www.ccil.org/~cowan
>        --Ursula K. Le Guin, Changing Planes
> 

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru