RE: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)"

Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com> Sat, 08 December 2007 19:35 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J15SN-0006gq-Mo; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 14:35:23 -0500
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J15SM-0006cE-QH for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 14:35:22 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J15SM-0006az-CW for ltru@ietf.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 14:35:22 -0500
Received: from mailc.microsoft.com ([131.107.115.214] helo=smtp.microsoft.com) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J15SL-0008Ho-Qm for ltru@ietf.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 14:35:22 -0500
Received: from tk1-exhub-c103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.56.116.114) by TK5-EXGWY-E803.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.169) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.222.3; Sat, 8 Dec 2007 11:35:20 -0800
Received: from NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.62.44]) by tk1-exhub-c103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.56.116.114]) with mapi; Sat, 8 Dec 2007 11:35:21 -0800
From: Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com>
To: Mark Davis <mark.davis@icu-project.org>
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 11:35:14 -0800
Subject: RE: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)"
Thread-Topic: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)"
Thread-Index: Acg50Nf2TY1hgKjHRdy5m+BrToO0ngAAIdWg
Message-ID: <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579561E5143280@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <003701c839c9$b3342d50$6601a8c0@DGBP7M81> <30b660a20712081115v7eb67a1ci52e43763e61be39f@mail.gmail.com> <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579561E514327E@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <30b660a20712081130k3c83c415jfc3f6c2ae1b2b1a6@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <30b660a20712081130k3c83c415jfc3f6c2ae1b2b1a6@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 6ffdee8af20de249c24731d8414917d3
Cc: Doug Ewell <dewell@roadrunner.com>, LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1867217509=="
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

You’re going to need to clarify that question for me to understand what you have in mind.

Peter

From: mark.edward.davis@gmail.com [mailto:mark.edward.davis@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mark Davis
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2007 11:31 AM
To: Peter Constable
Cc: Doug Ewell; LTRU Working Group
Subject: Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)"

I suspected as much. Is that the case for all the other duplicates that have one of them defined in 639-2?

Mark
On Dec 8, 2007 11:24 AM, Peter Constable < petercon@microsoft.com<mailto:petercon@microsoft.com>> wrote:

It is coincidental that an Altaic language spoken in China and an unrelated isolate language spoken in China both happen to have "Ainu" as their English name.



Peter
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru