RE: Moving forward (Was: [Ltru] matching draft, issue 50)

My mistake. I have changed the xml source, regenerated the text and html
versions and posted them to inter-locale.com. The dynamic link for the diff
should still work (albeit not for you?). I'll regenerate a diff in a little
while.

Please confirm that the file is now correct.

Addison

Addison Phillips
Internationalization Architect - Yahoo! Inc.

Internationalization is an architecture.
It is not a feature.  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Duerst [mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp] 
> Sent: vendredi 23 juin 2006 19:22
> To: Addison Phillips; Mark Davis
> Cc: LTRU Working Group; Ted Hardie
> Subject: Re: Moving forward (Was: [Ltru] matching draft, issue 50)
> 
> Hello Addison, Mark,
> 
> At 10:29 06/06/22, Martin Duerst wrote:
> >[co-chair hat (or actually, shepherd hat) on]
> >
> >The IETF Last Call has ended. I'd like to move forward, at least
> >with issues that seem to have reached consensus (mostly by nobody
> >bringing up any opposing views, which is fine for the minor
> >editorial issues that we are dealing with at the moment).
> >
> >The reply from John below is the only reply on issue 50 that I have
> >seen on the list.
> >
> >Absent sudden disagreement, I would like to instruct the editors
> >to prepare a new version of the draft with variant C for the 
> Abstract,
> >as well as with the other edits as described in
> >http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg04979.html,
> >and a diff to the -14 version.
> 
> I have checked all the changes you have made based on the diff
> at http://www.inter-locale.com/ID/matching-14-15-diff.html.
> Many thanks for your work.
> Everything looks okay to me except the Abstract where you have
> chosen variant D instead of variant C.
> 
> In http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg04978.html,
> I asked for preferences for various versions. Only John Covan and
> me expressed preferences, both for C. I have then asked you to use
> variant C in the mail above, and have also put that on the issues
> list.
> 
> I don't care about this issue too much, but I'd like to make sure
> it is handled properly. Can you please change to variant C, or
> explain why you really and seriously want variant D?
> 
> If you use variant C, please go ahead and submit a new version.
> If you prefer variant D, please say so.
> 
> Regards,   Martin.
> 
> >At 22:53 06/06/16, John Cowan wrote:
> >>Martin Duerst scripsit:
> >>
> >>> BTW, as a technical contributor, my preference is C 
> before D before
> >>> B before A.
> >>
> >>+1
> >>
> >>-- 
> >>John Cowan      cowan@ccil.org        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
> >>        Is it not written, "That which is written, is written"?
> 
> 
> #-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
> #-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       
> mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp     
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru