IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ltru] Re: action item: "other" collections in 639

"Frank Ellermann" <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Sat, 01 December 2007 14:40 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IyTVk-0004DM-Ue; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 09:40:04 -0500
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IyTVj-0004Ao-PA for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 09:40:03 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IyTVj-0004Af-Ff for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 09:40:03 -0500
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IyTVh-0001lO-SS for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 09:40:03 -0500
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IyTVX-0001pq-4a for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 14:39:51 +0000
Received: from c-180-160-112.hh.dial.de.ignite.net ([62.180.160.112]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ltru@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 14:39:51 +0000
Received: from nobody by c-180-160-112.hh.dial.de.ignite.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ltru@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 14:39:51 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ltru@lists.ietf.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 15:41:49 +0100
Organization: <http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <firrnd$m5f$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <E1IxWtu-0007Mu-3s@megatron.ietf.org><003d01c83254$ddd0cef0$6601a8c0@DGBP7M81><DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579561B42BB874@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com><fimli5$lip$1@ger.gmane.org> <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579561B42BB8E3@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-180-160-112.hh.dial.de.ignite.net
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1914
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f
Cc:
Subject: [Ltru] Re: action item: "other" collections in 639
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Peter Constable wrote:

>>> I've suggested in the past that removing collection IDs from
>>> BCP47 might not be a bad idea, but on several occasions people
>>> have indicated that they wish to have the collections kept.

>> "Removing" can't fly.  Do you mean "not add new" (in the 4645bis
>> bulk update), "deprecate old", or both ?
 
> Deprecate, and not add new.

Okay.  Then it could make sense to deprecate some giving a new
preferred value based on your list.  Ideally in a form where
Doug can reference a better source than an archived article in
4645bis, but if all else fails a "WG decision" is good enough.

 Frank



_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email