Re: [Ltru] RFC4645 to Historic status
Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> Thu, 31 August 2023 09:03 UTC
Return-Path: <tim@dropnumber.com>
X-Original-To: ltru@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CB1C14CF1A; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 02:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xSKjL9cWLDep; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 02:03:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.196]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26D83C14CF12; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 02:03:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxuslxaltgw00.schlund.de ([10.72.76.56]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus002 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LtZ1G-1pdEyJ0O6G-010sFk; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 11:03:11 +0200
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 05:03:09 -0400
From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org>, "cowan@ccil.org" <cowan@ccil.org>, "rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "francesca.palombini@ericsson.com" <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, "randy_presuhn@mindspring.com" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>, "duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, "ltru@ietf.org" <ltru@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <127541546.300742.1693472589908@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwboUWzUsdna65mR1gAg12DqiCTV1xJ4udcdsPTbOpNaZQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <mailman.79.1692212403.2397.ltru@ietf.org> <SJ0PR03MB6598363502C6A1BE8396FEF6CA1AA@SJ0PR03MB6598.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <516549640.3380391.1692310263006@email.ionos.com> <SJ0PR03MB65989AA736D9D1B92161CCB0CA1AA@SJ0PR03MB6598.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <723189438.3387115.1692312008380@email.ionos.com> <SJ0PR03MB6598D695F55085A47BC932E8CA1AA@SJ0PR03MB6598.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <1319152096.906754.1693332108616@email.ionos.com> <SJ0PR03MB6598BF87667F15857328CC7ECAE7A@SJ0PR03MB6598.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAL0qLwYovamEYRSDttam7HkEQCDXQ+F-oSr_Pi8oNpqpnH_z-Q@mail.gmail.com> <460538773.209462.1693444853594@email.ionos.com> <CAL0qLwboUWzUsdna65mR1gAg12DqiCTV1xJ4udcdsPTbOpNaZQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev50
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:hoiRBICkWIffSzdGF3Glq2Eu1gbvFrV6tjCF61xBBJBLDAg32UV vuVrTehvD2u41lRYugIsPC1IvhrOO2xXpja7F+fS6XoRl5CXpbKgxaVkhg3RjvQwp6mbWjY 9RXP3nt74Bii59NALaPG04BumqzS5mGTF2XsiVGLzv5w2XQTlN68HeKc33WDxfCFG8dlOyP 9BVnF4fuBqzbmBybw7u3Q==
UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:XFKMHQxpEtw=;0f4qyXT6FFCLb+Upq9uLFrSAzbj ueCfCtJCV7hIVtomlaKBnorSg8MiI7VV0g9aAMKm3u1M10K/dMJMzqQ9rRAM+W3xjX3SJjFhC kZXEHcZO8nPewfC5qbAOKhuHikkhCLS06s1OhVdE8qCGsoEmHe7H2BsqRQnddR90jRKtQQhg6 1u5ZgVNxiIfrLJD+cAxf2nZsMSJ/phneiQpOMWka1abYimAYBN7OAq7Z4Pxed1sZHD0PI6iY0 QmLzKVE93jkTJUOi01ap0EKPR9ePrE7CxQoWdqQ8l8J0dhjBZKV73m1SthVaK0FPh46zRta2B Cg/+ufVaGUUABpKMWMmwQgLCIfAHN3Wom1XfFNcXIdeGHl/KKnGufFGGGg8uX/Qh7uwU7UpQi WA8E8mTDZoGxrxZ3PnOiLsb0sr9thQecphNNCtYNL03UYAQJrkbAnft3TvINJbVIJESlSY4Q6 dktTbr0s5sNGJKHqxDy9mdPcouAGdTbWcVMY8gyEnSZMHQk0XyPsA+/lr9e65CwVqwV2eo0RA SxPdzUYndBGEMdwgHb1BD5n9CflAYDDdMzEb2bBeO7Mm9mswITdI1CcvN2uEZZoRC3IqbaY2t ONDiXj2BA4NfBhXYlQ04gY6G4o0FkgImy+ra/4G7iYRs83uKIG5dMWr173EOyqMdTpMknxUXu k25DoRO0/jhSZ2DJ74Ypo146XPbc9pqlWGfCtnm0oHMb9AZ6j9mM/9tUhZEUZ1f6WEvm1X8YA NJQsI7lCA9kIRUmrTxrM361MlrpeNi+ZD5rFYtPffWzZ52i0eAv5+eLXLofx+WWLs56wYHalJ K7Dbqp22+a9OWwlQ9k0fy1+a572S/6yLiqcMy/srMy/nr4gq1rc5kSwKMo9jhytbE1bN2ke4A /SZpnqSSXEnSQ8Q==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ltru/roWhKi1GzZJdf64zZUzxLtYAPEk>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] RFC4645 to Historic status
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ltru/>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 09:03:31 -0000
> On 08/30/2023 11:13 PM EDT Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 6:20 PM Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> > wrote: > > > I think changing the link was a good idea because it was the source of > > confusion. After more thought, it would be better(and more efficient for > > all) if it were labled Historic or removed all together so the next person > > who may come across the document won't be forced to read all the way up to > > the link that tells them they just wasted thier time, now possibly on > > purpose. > > > > Again, I've lost track in all the related threads and explanations. > > Changing which link, and to what? > > -MSK The link change shown in the errata I submitted https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7605
- Re: [Ltru] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4645 (7… John Cowan
- [Ltru] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4645 (7605) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Ltru] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4645 (7… Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4645 (7… Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Ltru] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4645 (7… Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4645 (7… Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4645 (7… Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] RFC4645 to Historic status Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] RFC4645 to Historic status Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Ltru] RFC4645 to Historic status Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] RFC4645 to Historic status Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Ltru] RFC4645 to Historic status Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Ltru] RFC4645 to Historic status Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Ltru] RFC4645 to Historic status Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Ltru] RFC4645 to Historic status Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] RFC4645 to Historic status Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] RFC4645 to Historic status Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] RFC4645 to Historic status Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] RFC4645 to Historic status Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Ltru] RFC4645 to Historic status Randy Presuhn