Re: [Ltru] Proposed -t0- subtag

"Phillips, Addison" <> Mon, 18 July 2011 14:36 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A773321F8B7C for <>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 07:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i5DlcBt2sYxV for <>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 07:36:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3666321F8B63 for <>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 07:36:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.67,222,1309737600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="745852877"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 18 Jul 2011 14:36:48 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6IEakqa007389 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:36:46 GMT
Received: from ([]) by ([fe80::24e8:aabe:e5e7:2f81%12]) with mapi; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 07:36:46 -0700
From: "Phillips, Addison" <>
To: CE Whitehead <>, "" <>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 07:36:49 -0700
Thread-Topic: [Ltru] Proposed -t0- subtag
Thread-Index: AcxFUFYgUBeYy1rdTbOR8VcNwMw9VAAB6OJw
Message-ID: <>
References: <SNT142-w18D0A48A7137C3535C2A5BB34A0@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <SNT142-w18D0A48A7137C3535C2A5BB34A0@phx.gbl>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_131F80DEA635F044946897AFDA9AC3476A946379CFEXSEA31Dantam_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Proposed -t0- subtag
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:36:53 -0000

No. Mark is saying that we should publish the draft without a ‘t0’ “mechanism” subtag and then consider adding one later if there is need.


From: [] On Behalf Of CE Whitehead
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 6:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Proposed -t0- subtag


From: Mark Davis â <mark at<mailto:mark@DOMAIN.HIDDEN>>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:56:38 -0700
> I agree; so I think we ought to see how everything works first, before extending.

I assume this means the proposal is on hold.  Is there any point now in forwarding it on to another list (such as lingualist; I can do so as I have joined that) to get feedback; or do you just waiting to get feedback on the transliteration scheme from places like ala-lc (and then perhaps on how the scheme might work for transcription & speech recognition  from the ISPs/developers/researchers? on this list).

Thanks if you can clarify this.


--C. E. Whitehead<>
> Mark
> â Il meglio à lâinimico del bene â