Re: Moving forward (Was: [Ltru] matching draft, issue 50)

Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Sat, 24 June 2006 02:37 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fty1i-00015K-DZ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:37:38 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fty1h-000159-2p for ltru@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:37:37 -0400
Received: from scmailgw1.scop.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.251.194]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fty1e-0007tx-CB for ltru@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:37:37 -0400
Received: from scmse2.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scmse2 [133.2.253.17]) by scmailgw1.scop.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id k5O2bVMb028972; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 11:37:31 +0900 (JST)
Received: from (133.2.210.1) by scmse2.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp via smtp id 1a84_626d04e0_032a_11db_8e85_0014221f2a2d; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 11:37:30 +0900
Received: from Tanzawa.it.aoyama.ac.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k5O2bK38012784; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 11:37:23 +0900
Message-Id: <6.0.0.20.2.20060624103110.09743c30@localhost>
X-Sender: duerst@localhost
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6J
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 11:22:02 +0900
To: Addison Phillips <addison@yahoo-inc.com>, Mark Davis <mark.davis@icu-project.org>
From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Subject: Re: Moving forward (Was: [Ltru] matching draft, issue 50)
In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.20.2.20060622102328.076eb700@localhost>
References: <6.0.0.20.2.20060616191343.076930d0@localhost> <20060616135307.GB32743@ccil.org> <6.0.0.20.2.20060622102328.076eb700@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 82c9bddb247d9ba4471160a9a865a5f3
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Hello Addison, Mark,

At 10:29 06/06/22, Martin Duerst wrote:
>[co-chair hat (or actually, shepherd hat) on]
>
>The IETF Last Call has ended. I'd like to move forward, at least
>with issues that seem to have reached consensus (mostly by nobody
>bringing up any opposing views, which is fine for the minor
>editorial issues that we are dealing with at the moment).
>
>The reply from John below is the only reply on issue 50 that I have
>seen on the list.
>
>Absent sudden disagreement, I would like to instruct the editors
>to prepare a new version of the draft with variant C for the Abstract,
>as well as with the other edits as described in
>http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg04979.html,
>and a diff to the -14 version.

I have checked all the changes you have made based on the diff
at http://www.inter-locale.com/ID/matching-14-15-diff.html.
Many thanks for your work.
Everything looks okay to me except the Abstract where you have
chosen variant D instead of variant C.

In http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg04978.html,
I asked for preferences for various versions. Only John Covan and
me expressed preferences, both for C. I have then asked you to use
variant C in the mail above, and have also put that on the issues
list.

I don't care about this issue too much, but I'd like to make sure
it is handled properly. Can you please change to variant C, or
explain why you really and seriously want variant D?

If you use variant C, please go ahead and submit a new version.
If you prefer variant D, please say so.

Regards,   Martin.

>At 22:53 06/06/16, John Cowan wrote:
>>Martin Duerst scripsit:
>>
>>> BTW, as a technical contributor, my preference is C before D before
>>> B before A.
>>
>>+1
>>
>>-- 
>>John Cowan      cowan@ccil.org        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
>>        Is it not written, "That which is written, is written"?


#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp     


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru