Re: [Ltru] [apps-discuss] Fw: I-D Action:draft-presuhn-rfc2482-historic-00.txt

SM <sm@resistor.net> Mon, 14 June 2010 19:26 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8103A68CC for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:26:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.917
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.682, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dyi3kOzBXAV7 for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns1.qubic.net (ns1.qubic.net [208.69.177.116]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 274B33A6948 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net ([10.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.qubic.net (8.14.5.Alpha0/8.14.5.Alpha0) with ESMTP id o5EJQSdi016881 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1276543603; x=1276630003; bh=BsjTBpZNthYyllI6jBQIBm21pdV6HPjDZVl8xA2flxw=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=LsiQqeT/P+8cydhAld08StvK0+c9JuQ57gq6WOtIcpH9USmNhXFJ4mmqKT7fh6Wp6 EWaGzH4IJyoxYN//m6kpKmUyM/rYIaDx9vAIO9/DjDImw74qSwwQ06yYWYjIH81XVZ jEihN3RNCcC7ZW4SX/XkEHBsRUnKIyFItF/q+2yA=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1276543603; x=1276630003; bh=BsjTBpZNthYyllI6jBQIBm21pdV6HPjDZVl8xA2flxw=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=pGPsBA5kJA9B17Sy5F3m17urF3smm96A/Ce/2UX3T9eW62V2287yirKVUzhA/RZiu QINezTm370m/bzJ2t9mSWMus/zG0caFyuFRQx+6Y4zZ2PJRAYuLFUss6FleVOp/3uP FDOZcSrqckUJ/Q1/ZprObyr3ISNy8BSQnfRjwsww=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=resistor.net; c=simple; q=dns; b=j0Qukpt/mkGoQVlPtpSpXA5Mo2zhW4U636PX/S/yRMO0Xz5XtZE8tfsoe27IefuVc Kz29+g4RokQV+sBlWvCmquvQnwUqdkdtSKdND8t6mbQeN9a73PecDH+5RFxVCG6KB4V WXUG5tVeiQ3gR7kNDlLr3VPUfVoR69wy/g1Sepk=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20100614121536.0a68ec90@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:25:49 -0700
To: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <008501cb0bf3$47072480$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
References: <008501cb0bf3$47072480$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:33:27 -0700
Cc: ltru@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ltru] [apps-discuss] Fw: I-D Action:draft-presuhn-rfc2482-historic-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:26:44 -0000

Hi Randy,
At 11:56 14-06-10, Randy Presuhn wrote:
>Please let me know if you have any comments on this I-D.
>I suggest the ltru@ietf.org mailing list would be a suitable
>venue for discussion.

This I-D reclassifies RFC 2482 as Historic.  The Intended Status 
should be informational.   The RFC 2119 paragraph in Section 1 is not 
needed.   The "SHOULD NOT" in Section 2 can be lowercase.

If a RFC is Historic, it should not be referenced by newer RFCs as 
that status does not apply to Standards Track documents only as 
mentioned in Section 2.

Regards,
-sm