[Ltru] Re: Suggested language for "mis"

Randy Presuhn wrote:

>> The 'mis' (Uncoded) primary language subtag SHOULD NOT be used. According to
>> ISO 639, it is used to identify linguistic content whose language is known
>> but which does not *currently* have a corresponding subtag. It is thus
>> intrinsically unstable -- the addition of other codes in the future can
>> render its application invalid at any point without any warning -- and hence
>> incompatible with the stability goals of BCP 47. It is thus always
>> preferable to use other subtags: either "und" or -- with prior agreement --
>> private use subtags.
> ...

> As a technical contributor, I rather like this proposal.

+1,
no need to discuss MARC and other good excuses to violate the SHOULD NOT.

Frank

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru