Re: [Ltru] Punjabi

<sukhjinder_sidhu@hotmail.com> Fri, 16 March 2007 01:03 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HS0qa-0005gc-P6; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:03:08 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HRqNo-0001E3-PB for ltru@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:52:44 -0400
Received: from bay0-omc1-s16.bay0.hotmail.com ([65.54.246.88]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HRqNk-00039m-GJ for ltru@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:52:44 -0400
Received: from hotmail.com ([207.46.8.24]) by bay0-omc1-s16.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Thu, 15 Mar 2007 06:52:40 -0700
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 06:52:39 -0700
Message-ID: <BAY117-DAV14890DF7F027491C0EE0D9E8720@phx.gbl>
Received: from 87.194.38.9 by BAY117-DAV14.phx.gbl with DAV; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:52:35 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [87.194.38.9]
X-Originating-Email: [sukhjinder_sidhu@hotmail.com]
X-Sender: sukhjinder_sidhu@hotmail.com
From: sukhjinder_sidhu@hotmail.com
To: Mark Davis <mark.davis@icu-project.org>
References: <BAY117-W1545194BA616EBFE84087CE8730@phx.gbl> <20070314222951.GQ1509@mercury.ccil.org> <BAY117-DAV166CE828969B2DBDE07C49E8730@phx.gbl> <30b660a20703141723l6f060b9fi8f887c67dd76a513@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Punjabi
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:52:18 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="utf-8"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail desktop 8.0.1226
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V8.0.1226
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Mar 2007 13:52:39.0895 (UTC) FILETIME=[3242BE70:01C76709]
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:03:07 -0400
Cc: rick@unicode.org, Nayyara Karamat <nayyara.karamat@nu.edu.pk>, "Sarmad Hussain, Dr." <sarmad.hussain@nu.edu.pk>, iso639-2@loc.gov, cldr-users@unicode.org, LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>, Abbas Malik <abbas.malik@gmail.com>, iso639-3@sil.org
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

> Our policy is to have each parent locale's data be what is appropriate for
> the most populous (measured as literate, first or second language 
> speakers)
> child locale. So what we'd need to have at that point is the population of
> pa users (as opposed to lah) in Pakistan vs India, which would determine
> whether we change the contents of pa at that point. It sounds like, from
> what you say, that the bulk of the population of pa users (measured as
> literate, first or second language speakers) would be in India, while
> Pakistan would be more lah users than pa users. Is that the case?

Yes that's correct.  Neither "Lahnda" nor Punjabi are taught formally in 
Pakistan Punjab.  Only Urdu and English.

Regards,
Sukhjinder 


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru