Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?

"Mark Davis" <mark.davis@icu-project.org> Wed, 05 December 2007 23:17 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J03UE-00061t-Nw; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:17:02 -0500
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J03UD-00060t-1h for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:17:01 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J03UC-0005zi-Nf for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:17:00 -0500
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.179]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J03UB-00082w-TK for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:17:00 -0500
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j4so5490wah for <ltru@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 15:16:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=jZ+NxMr7mh/TnPn4GslI33G/vgvij4klSNOngt/pFos=; b=EhNeyLtZ8jASqUlpWGppxqHwy63HclW7eptkT2ChIJUiy10/ORs2ZfQPDHuWI+n+6A/nQ+bfN3Eipy7EUHm919ub3gotat4NtU1bVQTMtVQwIXVzXRFsmGWwOvC0mu1pkLHqdUwOpqUsfrKt8W9UnZXa43GbiwANWu9EwE7+ArU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=f/e/yEuZmEq6JCUl5RwMgZoPSUtitVw2tNGyiGVwKGGPcByH0V1OtJLfw3K/cKPCBfHg+3d0+roBl8k0ItzXcPtZmJr3e4bPc1jCh6ePxtLn9pHv7MpnkVXh6iSJfqp9pBoxvoBbgA+guBv3SghLMscaiX8S5MttIRRLuQbUljk=
Received: by 10.114.127.1 with SMTP id z1mr675027wac.1196896618034; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 15:16:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.192.9 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 15:16:57 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <30b660a20712051516q47fab024l839458f82183a8f3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 15:16:57 -0800
From: Mark Davis <mark.davis@icu-project.org>
To: Addison Phillips <addison@yahoo-inc.com>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?
In-Reply-To: <475730C6.7040903@yahoo-inc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20071204112939.GA13475@nic.fr> <20071205033042.GA10807@mercury.ccil.org> <30b660a20712041936w4a472416ibdbeeda192629c9e@mail.gmail.com> <30b660a20712041949k4cb44ed1m9065459707a2872d@mail.gmail.com> <20071205040035.GD10807@mercury.ccil.org> <47562BE6.5080003@w3.org> <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579561E4CB3EFC@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <C9BF0238EED3634BA1866AEF14C7A9E55DFC391373@NA-EXMSG-C116.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <e395be80712051336p300f9d16xea458e44794e11b5@mail.gmail.com> <475730C6.7040903@yahoo-inc.com>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: bfaf2d25d3e02fc2
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: a7d2e37451f7f22841e3b6f40c67db0f
Cc: "ltru@lists.ietf.org" <ltru@lists.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0154696503=="
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

LGTM

On Dec 5, 2007 3:14 PM, Addison Phillips <addison@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:

> Would making the ABNF read like the following be adequate:
>
> ...
>
> language      = (2*3ALPHA [ extlang ]) ; shortest ISO 639 code
>               / 4ALPHA                 ; reserved for future use
>               / 5*8ALPHA               ; registered language subtag
>
> extlang       = *3("-" 3ALPHA)         ; OBSOLETE (do not use)
>
> ...
>
> Addison
>
>
> Ira McDonald wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > And, oddly, RFC 2119 does not define the two important conformance words
> used
> > widely in IETF specs "DEPRECATED" (dying) and "OBSOLETE" (dead).  But I
> urge
> > that an inline comment in the ABNF use the word OBSOLETE and the text
> make
> > clear that conforming implementations MUST NOT produce or consume
> "extlang"
> > subtags.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > - Ira
> >
> > On Dec 5, 2007 2:32 PM, Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>    2. Leave extlang in the ABNF, but document that it is
> >>>> "permanently
> >>>>>>    reserved" (will never be used, a la ISO).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> I favor this.
> >>>>>
> >>>> me too.
> >>> "Permanently reserved" is not strong enough, IMO. It must be clear
> that extlang is *permanently dead*. I think > #1 makes that clearer, but I'd
> accept a variation of #2 that left no doubt.
> >> I agree with Peter that if its dead it should be made clear that it is
> completely dead.  "Permanently reserved" implies that software still needs
> to consider the possibility that such tags would exist, adding complexity
> that will never be used.
> >>
> >> - Shawn
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Ltru mailing list
> >> Ltru@ietf.org
> >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Addison Phillips
> Globalization Architect -- Yahoo! Inc.
> Chair -- W3C Internationalization Core WG
>
> Internationalization is an architecture.
> It is not a feature.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
>



-- 
Mark
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru