Re: [Ltru] Charter - sign(ed) language tag construction ?

John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> Thu, 06 July 2006 17:55 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FyY4b-0004SE-RQ; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 13:55:34 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FyY4a-0004Rz-PA for ltru@ietf.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 13:55:32 -0400
Received: from mercury.ccil.org ([192.190.237.100]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FyY4Y-0000Pe-ID for ltru@ietf.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 13:55:32 -0400
Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1FyY4X-000543-EJ; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 13:55:29 -0400
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 13:55:29 -0400
To: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Charter - sign(ed) language tag construction ?
Message-ID: <20060706175529.GD16406@ccil.org>
References: <F8ACB1B494D9734783AAB114D0CE68FE08CB1597@RED-MSG-52.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <001201c6a121$e1c1b940$6501a8c0@oemcomputer>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <001201c6a121$e1c1b940$6501a8c0@oemcomputer>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Randy Presuhn scripsit:

> Would it make sense to add material on how tagging for sign(ed)
> languages to the 3066ter effort being proposed?  If so, could
> Peter's message be distilled down to a high-level sentence for
> the charter discussion?

Here's my first try:

	The working group is also expected to design a suitable mechanism
	for the tagging of sign languages and signed spoken languages.

-- 
John Cowan                                cowan@ccil.org
At times of peril or dubitation,          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Perform swift circular ambulation,
With loud and high-pitched ululation.

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru