IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lucid] Communication.

Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> Thu, 19 March 2015 23:15 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: lucid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lucid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7311A000D for <lucid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 16:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a63w-5zfXLPq for <lucid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 16:15:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-f173.google.com (mail-ig0-f173.google.com [209.85.213.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25DBC1A000B for <lucid@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 16:15:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igcau2 with SMTP id au2so3830899igc.0 for <lucid@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 16:15:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XDNLA20TfiXC51XEELGkskxaijdiD4H6mWXoWwdChDA=; b=l+fGjaha/82qwTSmNbyxo+6nF59ubIDQ+Briyrd1TETLslPO0xKnozSJEfExdRs0kt IFzhtvjXLs5Ix/GQyPCULJvdla6zal+6lt2oV36JwfIgspw8ivKVc5p+svYum9iMojR3 AFx5Esm9NNdZ4RhS74RNkCnKLSmHJrIXscrWcUZKiz24Cz4F0cC0GRN3rKFd2ImBaxJD z9S7HAXAysY2WAo3IntzJ3lnpT/tADP6FT0fqtnyvR4whHVMHuS+DX8VkVUFqBXFyHLK bi5THxjdom2p9dUmSlEvBSJzL7BF8tusAO1M7mmBcoYSRefw3N+bA4Z4rLayKeyL0SSl XxRw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn4tZNJUD2DFyaW4GTDqiR/wyq2qFRB4Z45oiFmJ7NP7Ko0JHXPyYkPXFjklEdeFIvLRKA3
X-Received: by 10.50.78.9 with SMTP id x9mr20778142igw.44.1426806954515; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 16:15:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aither.local (c-73-34-202-214.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [73.34.202.214]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g195sm1880692iog.24.2015.03.19.16.15.53 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 19 Mar 2015 16:15:53 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <550B58A8.8030101@andyet.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 17:15:52 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com>, "lucid@ietf.org" <lucid@ietf.org>
References: <BLUPR03MB1378075831687B9D8DCE68A382010@BLUPR03MB1378.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <550B54CA.1050202@andyet.net> <BLUPR03MB1378243051BDD99E366CE40782010@BLUPR03MB1378.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BLUPR03MB1378243051BDD99E366CE40782010@BLUPR03MB1378.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lucid/1-50ZiM_5GcKaW1ZctLZAHPyp5Q>
Subject: Re: [Lucid] Communication.
X-BeenThere: lucid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Locale-free UniCode Identifiers \(LUCID\)" <lucid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lucid>, <mailto:lucid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lucid/>
List-Post: <mailto:lucid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lucid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lucid>, <mailto:lucid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 23:15:56 -0000

On 3/19/15 5:14 PM, Shawn Steele wrote:
>> Just as with IDNA2008, we structured PRECIS so that decisions are made algorithmically based on the properties of code points (which together constitute the code point's identity), not the shapes of glyphs.
>
> Yet this discussion is about whether that algorithm correctly handles the characters based on the shapes of the glyphs.

Humans aren't computers and they make decisions and get confused based 
on appearance. I don't see the two perspectives as mutually exclusive.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://andyet.com/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email