IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lucid] Communication.

Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com> Thu, 19 March 2015 23:14 UTC

Return-Path: <Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: lucid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lucid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B4C1A000A for <lucid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 16:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4xUhYZ91HCEK for <lucid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 16:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0763.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:763]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0A381A000B for <lucid@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 16:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLUPR03MB1378.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.163.81.12) by BLUPR03MB151.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.212.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.106.15; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 23:14:07 +0000
Received: from BLUPR03MB1378.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.163.81.12) by BLUPR03MB1378.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.163.81.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.112.19; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 23:14:06 +0000
Received: from BLUPR03MB1378.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([25.163.81.12]) by BLUPR03MB1378.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([25.163.81.12]) with mapi id 15.01.0112.000; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 23:14:06 +0000
From: Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>, "lucid@ietf.org" <lucid@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lucid] Communication.
Thread-Index: AQHQYphZmKACuLeXr0GotId8E7ZSCp0kb3LA
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 23:14:06 +0000
Message-ID: <BLUPR03MB1378243051BDD99E366CE40782010@BLUPR03MB1378.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BLUPR03MB1378075831687B9D8DCE68A382010@BLUPR03MB1378.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <550B54CA.1050202@andyet.net>
In-Reply-To: <550B54CA.1050202@andyet.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8:ee31::2]
authentication-results: andyet.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR03MB1378; UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR03MB151;
x-forefront-antispam-report: BMV:1; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(86362001)(2656002)(107886001)(86612001)(106116001)(2950100001)(46102003)(99286002)(2501003)(92566002)(62966003)(2900100001)(77156002)(102836002)(122556002)(40100003)(33656002)(76176999)(54356999)(76576001)(87936001)(74316001)(50986999)(3826002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR03MB1378; H:BLUPR03MB1378.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR03MB1378E138F1A35EFADED9E5BB82010@BLUPR03MB1378.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5002010)(5005006); SRVR:BLUPR03MB1378; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR03MB1378;
x-forefront-prvs: 052017CAF1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Mar 2015 23:14:06.5358 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR03MB1378
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lucid/sViz4JgCbQ20LkuO29wlCdPI6oE>
Subject: Re: [Lucid] Communication.
X-BeenThere: lucid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Locale-free UniCode Identifiers \(LUCID\)" <lucid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lucid>, <mailto:lucid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lucid/>
List-Post: <mailto:lucid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lucid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lucid>, <mailto:lucid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 23:14:30 -0000

> Just as with IDNA2008, we structured PRECIS so that decisions are made algorithmically based on the properties of code points (which together constitute the code point's identity), not the shapes of glyphs.

Yet this discussion is about whether that algorithm correctly handles the characters based on the shapes of the glyphs.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email