Re: [Lurk] WG Call for adoption of draft-rescorla-tls-subcerts

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Wed, 12 April 2017 19:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: lurk@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lurk@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5FEB129AB0 for <lurk@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:34:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AGLT2-TcH6pN for <lurk@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22d.google.com (mail-yw0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D1EF12943E for <lurk@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id k13so16610404ywk.1 for <lurk@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5xy62kjyJynYa0x0VwtnfisQBcPsh2dk7d0TcBuEFhE=; b=jz7kUxY6VNW/PRjFMPIfJt+ZGcbhT+dr99qzVp6iDDctDBaQZptPI33e1ZhRK19uVc jEyDawx3S/NXN55nX7HGBUoF/uQ8JWcZ0mCXudUQfN38BEcG2S3HbEHwGnt/htralZpn qJcs5xonfeljiC8wR3mo20cejIB02N+VYK7a8Z7pHHbwhPnwm6GcLqyr2qbIBw6DEhmg KJ6EQ5sMMiIe67fNb9lSsRuBhzWDsd5VijmMKNYMMIpxlgukL9eGff+ac+OKXl+0WmXS KBbnJXOCE4uqV5J/yOtPPH2ZzKAnFKWTd6TbWRVksDyWig44W/pKyRpYunFB3o5MLixy j67g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5xy62kjyJynYa0x0VwtnfisQBcPsh2dk7d0TcBuEFhE=; b=OFzSP9juyBwnud0znwhpGkQ9T/ULHi11vEU4m4K2L79cLlHPCNTVx6QnF+uZFP17Eq AbyPfOHwt+LHNI78Nrk+uyI4cVlCz1j1UmQRSf4zeWqH4NQcH1cLGDnX+0qURhCiftWQ w5oEBOp+Vjv3AUDp61Bbc9cGmEcIZR2vcKMrSMl8KYDMhQbX50tnS6Z2HwBkR4iUA+D6 kcHTSS7R0Rs9tghdDt12ugy02nBq/qMbMD70Dcqqa5/hwMj/X6MP8RpXBAE3AcEF27m0 EBi/vq9zvfxwYEPCz3bHVE67doVDlcFJ4BwnacNmcsjta8uIHvAGGfi8zgv5SAR313uu Cljw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4uvLnB//OFLQsjKEGeHfHvvkGL+WKkpcL6BN5fE2zX7hPPDrIdo3mD/GhFhHBCJc2HkrRZ6rrlGVn9/g==
X-Received: by 10.13.203.73 with SMTP id n70mr12528647ywd.71.1492025669675; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.113.7 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <601C7C89-F149-4E97-A474-C128041925EA@sn3rd.com>
References: <601C7C89-F149-4E97-A474-C128041925EA@sn3rd.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:33:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPs-gbkMg4BDU7+AY9y7GPfNUiVPRPHPqF-CSuYn4m2EA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Cc: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>, LURK BoF <lurk@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114fd3d609946a054cfd4c93
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lurk/HCqMDxFDuKpvNpRMCylhdrqky1g>
Subject: Re: [Lurk] WG Call for adoption of draft-rescorla-tls-subcerts
X-BeenThere: lurk@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Limited Use of Remote Keys <lurk.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lurk>, <mailto:lurk-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lurk/>
List-Post: <mailto:lurk@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lurk-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lurk>, <mailto:lurk-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 19:34:32 -0000

Unsurprisingly, I favor adopting this draft.

-Ekr


On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> At our IETF 98 session, there was support in the room to adopt
> draft-rescorla-tls-subcerts [0].  We need to confirm this support on the
> list so please let the list know whether you support adoption of the draft
> and are willing to review/comment on the draft before 20170429.  If you
> object to its adoption, please let us know why.
>
> Clearly, the WG is going to need to work through the trade-offs between
> short-lived certificates and sub-certs because both seem, to some, to be
> addressing the same problem.
>
> Cheers,
>
> J&S
>
> [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-rescorla-tls-subcerts
> _______________________________________________
> Lurk mailing list
> Lurk@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lurk
>