Re: [Lurk] [E] Re: lurk@Hackathon102

sanjay.mishra@verizon.com Thu, 14 June 2018 00:19 UTC

Return-Path: <sanjay.mishra@verizon.com>
X-Original-To: lurk@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lurk@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA55130EBC for <lurk@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 17:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.32
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.32 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=verizon.com header.b=KC5FmCdo; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=verizon.com header.b=smOMQvrb; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=verizon.com header.b=HRvUWYKc
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lWbKig9WD8sK for <lurk@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 17:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omzsmtpe03.verizonbusiness.com (omzsmtpe03.verizonbusiness.com [199.249.25.208]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 716C61277CC for <lurk@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 17:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=verizon.com; i=@verizon.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1528935596; x=1560471596; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=krYvEKxTmunSeOPeBrkTBQ0vgaCUCDjGEsQTEs77CRI=; b=KC5FmCdohaVOWGw9GdU+5lwJZwEaehI7erV9Pp8DjA90udOdNbKTMUwV 72vEl1842dlbm/QqLGc7XYjeGwAEV+VitvFZIAQnahEwbNxvOFbP3BMdJ +Ze3YHXZL3TjsRhTFpY82uWnfROm1Hhl/o5yyI1a33t3P5BldqcTFMggf w=;
Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi01.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.143]) by omzsmtpe03.verizonbusiness.com with ESMTP; 14 Jun 2018 00:19:55 +0000
Received: from rogue-10-255-192-101.rogue.vzwcorp.com (HELO apollo.verizonwireless.com) ([10.255.192.101]) by fldsmtpi01.verizon.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 14 Jun 2018 00:19:17 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=verizon.com; i=@verizon.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1528935557; x=1560471557; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=krYvEKxTmunSeOPeBrkTBQ0vgaCUCDjGEsQTEs77CRI=; b=smOMQvrb6xD5Lp+RY67jFoeOYMtoRJTxzyoI0HmcslIXVfk2JAM/ETLD TcoYlo/111Q1JKwaUHoHnyRvjB3Xb8aZjY++Q3NfQ+xlwqbSdOm5uKMqu Yj9qWY8Yg2w0FJEArchPR5ohE7x5bNEiwC3vIiM4WjS3v6qIRKEtwPY8h 4=;
Received: from pioneer.tdc.vzwcorp.com (HELO eris.verizonwireless.com) ([10.254.88.34]) by apollo.verizonwireless.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 13 Jun 2018 20:19:16 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=verizon.com; i=@verizon.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1528935556; x=1560471556; h=to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version:from; bh=krYvEKxTmunSeOPeBrkTBQ0vgaCUCDjGEsQTEs77CRI=; b=HRvUWYKczv3XrOt+r7VLfgw5f13oggthijsQQH9lLEPJrksHu6u0xJSq tGMEXnN+AOgxxTqBvf7+BQGHtBfx3iD6nTkmXtKDVkxJn5IOGgYmsl6WQ dfo4Uw35aD0Swlo4nCFZw6OWHZQCVrfNctSdrjxLpKaAqsnu9ol/TaKA5 Q=;
From: sanjay.mishra@verizon.com
X-Host: pioneer.tdc.vzwcorp.com
Received: from ohtwi1exh002.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com ([10.144.218.44]) by eris.verizonwireless.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA256; 14 Jun 2018 00:19:16 +0000
Received: from tbwexch29apd.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com (153.114.162.53) by OHTWI1EXH002.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com (10.144.218.44) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 20:19:16 -0400
Received: from OMZP1LUMXCA01.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com (144.8.22.171) by tbwexch29apd.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com (153.114.162.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 20:19:15 -0400
Received: from OMZP1LUMXCA08.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com (144.8.22.181) by OMZP1LUMXCA01.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com (144.8.22.171) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 19:19:15 -0500
Received: from OMZP1LUMXCA08.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com ([144.8.22.181]) by OMZP1LUMXCA08.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com ([144.8.22.181]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 19:19:15 -0500
To: Ori Finkelman <orif@qwilt.com>, Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>
CC: LURK BoF <lurk@ietf.org>, Dmitry Kravkov <dmitryk@qwilt.com>
Thread-Topic: [E] Re: [Lurk] lurk@Hackathon102
Thread-Index: AQHT/kAbLl3WUMUeHEOWC7DEPsJfFqRe7Zig
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 00:19:15 +0000
Message-ID: <23f9e0b1355b434ebcd3a555d4f47962@OMZP1LUMXCA08.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com>
References: <CADZyTk=8KkS0rGneKAiTgW79BgsDSU08B7VvJZQ234B9wmSWQA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMb9nTu+pbrXdwqAxzgX7KtLG6Nco46SWMBJs5zqWB84knoztA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMb9nTu+pbrXdwqAxzgX7KtLG6Nco46SWMBJs5zqWB84knoztA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.144.60.250]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_23f9e0b1355b434ebcd3a555d4f47962OMZP1LUMXCA08uswinadvzw_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lurk/JvDMt623u_GBDHbF3fP3vOkW7q8>
Subject: Re: [Lurk] [E] Re: lurk@Hackathon102
X-BeenThere: lurk@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Limited Use of Remote Keys <lurk.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lurk>, <mailto:lurk-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lurk/>
List-Post: <mailto:lurk@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lurk-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lurk>, <mailto:lurk-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 00:20:00 -0000

I have updated the IETF102 hackathon wiki page for LURK.

Please let me know if I have missed any major work item you would like to be added.

https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ietf/meeting/wiki/102hackathon

Thanks
-Sanjay


From: Ori Finkelman [mailto:orif@qwilt.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2018 5:15 AM
To: Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>;
Cc: Mishra, Sanjay <sanjay.mishra@one.verizon.com>;; LURK BoF <lurk@ietf.org>;; Dmitry Kravkov <dmitryk@qwilt.com>;
Subject: [E] Re: [Lurk] lurk@Hackathon102

Hi Daniel and Sanjay,

Some of the goals we may aim to achieve in the IETF102 Hackathon (some are already under development)
+ A CLurk OpenSSL implementation (ongoing work)
+ Nginx integration (ongoing work)
   - benchmark for session establishment, CPU and latency
+ Possibly a second cache server reference integration. ATS and Varnish are good candidates
+ A second LURK server implementation, preferably using a more performant language than Python, possible Go or Java.
+ Management model and API for the LURK key server, Daniel proposed YANG, is there a re need for an I-D for that ?
+ HA model
  - What should be the HA model ?
  - Load balancer ?
  - Configuring the LURK client with multiple LURK server addresses ?

Thanks,
Ori

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 8:28 PM, Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com<mailto:daniel.migault@ericsson.com>> wrote:
Thanks Sanjay for raising this point.

Since we now have at least a second implementation of lurk, it would be good to proceed to interoperability test.

Other things that come to my mind are:
* Editing vector tests for future implementations.
* Designing some performance measurements

As far as pylurk is concerned there are multiple points we could focused on:
* lurk client - sevrer communication:
** UDP multithreading
** UDP/DTLS
** TCP
** TCP/TLS
** HTTPS
* updating construct to construct 2.9
* ....

I am happy to take any comments / feed backs and add items as they come to my mind.

Yours,
Daniel



On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:24 PM, <sanjay.mishra=40verizon.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:sanjay.mishra=40verizon.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
To add to Daniel’s update, there are plans to bring an early implementation at the Hackathon in Montreal (IETF102). Please feel free to reach out to Daniel, Dmitry or me for any implementation related questions.

-Sanjay

From: Lurk [mailto:lurk-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:lurk-bounces@ietf.org>] On Behalf Of Daniel Migault
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 11:12 AM
To: LURK BoF <lurk@ietf.org<mailto:lurk@ietf.org>>
Subject: [E] [Lurk] pylurk

Hi,

We are happy to let you know that we have been able to publish our implementation of pylurk on github [1] as well as on pypi [2].

This is an early implementation of draft-mglt-lurk-lurk [3] and draft-mglt-lurk-tls12 [4]. We expect to update the drafts to reflects our findings while implementing soon.

If you encounter any issue or have any question, feel free to raise you concern and of course any comment / feed back is appreciated!

Yours,
Daniel

[1] https://github.com/mglt/pylurk<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_mglt_pylurk&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=XniVbishGiO2Ao9hKqSc-hTVIWCi3T-x6GdHR4ZTgoM&m=uDsnQIk-WRzcF3eSc7AqZKkP8rKw6ND7l2U5KtRdwa4&s=i1ej8GdJ7wGzzOQdya7-frDePvxHdsWal_wFv8FPvrk&e=>
[2] https://pypi.org/project/pylurk/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__pypi.org_project_pylurk_&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=XniVbishGiO2Ao9hKqSc-hTVIWCi3T-x6GdHR4ZTgoM&m=uDsnQIk-WRzcF3eSc7AqZKkP8rKw6ND7l2U5KtRdwa4&s=9pcQpr-0ORpWkMClnhrqfYjkdMuawxmuwbv1XPVbIOQ&e=>
[3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mglt-lurk-lurk/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dmglt-2Dlurk-2Dlurk_&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=XniVbishGiO2Ao9hKqSc-hTVIWCi3T-x6GdHR4ZTgoM&m=uDsnQIk-WRzcF3eSc7AqZKkP8rKw6ND7l2U5KtRdwa4&s=EDP277NhIg5iAp5pA0fge8nKosSirLFL9yhXSiCOooQ&e=>
[4] https://github.com/mglt/draft-mglt-lurk-tls12/blob/master/draft-mglt-lurk-tls12.mkd<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_mglt_draft-2Dmglt-2Dlurk-2Dtls12_blob_master_draft-2Dmglt-2Dlurk-2Dtls12.mkd&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=XniVbishGiO2Ao9hKqSc-hTVIWCi3T-x6GdHR4ZTgoM&m=uDsnQIk-WRzcF3eSc7AqZKkP8rKw6ND7l2U5KtRdwa4&s=VB1TauZ4XA0SW09Out7EdlgKP64sTiG9oP9OQHmfRfg&e=>


_______________________________________________
Lurk mailing list
Lurk@ietf.org<mailto:Lurk@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lurk<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_lurk&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=XniVbishGiO2Ao9hKqSc-hTVIWCi3T-x6GdHR4ZTgoM&m=wKtvS1QMJNQew3ZZ5L0YGe3AiCu04WZ3IZ2NglT-uls&s=XWyLeFKXCjeMzd2OGncQY28CQ_7agLAGvk8bF2NoEto&e=>


_______________________________________________
Lurk mailing list
Lurk@ietf.org<mailto:Lurk@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lurk<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_lurk&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=XniVbishGiO2Ao9hKqSc-hTVIWCi3T-x6GdHR4ZTgoM&m=wKtvS1QMJNQew3ZZ5L0YGe3AiCu04WZ3IZ2NglT-uls&s=XWyLeFKXCjeMzd2OGncQY28CQ_7agLAGvk8bF2NoEto&e=>



--
Ori Finkelman
Qwilt | Work: +972-72-2221647 | Mobile: +972-52-3832189 | orif@qwilt.com<mailto:orif@qwilt.com>