IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lurk] [TLS] WG Call for adoption of draft-rescorla-tls-subcerts

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Wed, 12 April 2017 21:25 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: lurk@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lurk@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8AD12EB61 for <lurk@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aAHEjTcI1vwH for <lurk@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDE71129B6A for <lurk@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:25:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id o81so97479087wmb.1 for <lurk@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:25:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1fLObzvuX4XejYFdGR2kzYomX79/vqZYtry00o2Kzak=; b=kK1PY9bh3BnTG/QJT+X3plnY/vb4MCJzgzCcO2KaWw46D8wYPAEvsTMR5AFUNBUJwq IU2KXHxj57Inw9RrzanaDbyPkczZ37DUq8paAC44ikfQr8owe/DHBWnqlqnQ7IUV5qj4 kTHpBEccrfn3k7bkAyubnrJsebzDpCqyqpQJ5E2SlikcemLT+9ZOmgej+l/zaFLIRfGQ xg9nWiILci48Fku8d+vnFH7xqa10a2V2ThAMVTJpthTbmsTf+pUjiNNj10jz3ccENCaT 81DI7U52bb0w+T/fm0iMAWJKFRvR8Aq/thtOXlGPHNsU+siBpaS+pmZltXRI3FIydkOU sQCQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1fLObzvuX4XejYFdGR2kzYomX79/vqZYtry00o2Kzak=; b=B+wYhr3DcSxvfnSnyHSFRMTmLG2GS00ZtDhIv0K+i0M4s2wZCIXzJ4xmn0XpLe1IoE tRJ/767poYUcIAoEMwbthifT3Yb0i/1W/IGE7Ws8ujwGG8IBMSZQ9mi9VE09iP44rrA9 kPALnNh1YmRieuTTOKIgDrbyvJ/uCHuprUYbHXAHqOm1xTqHSolKVegKM8e90ZspO1kV M7Tk+WhVyeRJso2k+Cju9TmDBFikQ24EQdFDD0N1R/sbSLjOJXExfJLLTUlZwCkPhRdl +mHsdeqwX9vvLB/1PndlYkptWhQqnIm/JREXF9k8mV/WOzMQYq5F8BsXxwJcZjr9X+nK HJIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/5nnRFVdIYqT3kSJ6we/CC7bfuAnXBw8xjiRf8PlCmxrrRtpZso yIJwwkob8egYjHlM6Nqi2tY9oK0QIg==
X-Received: by 10.28.66.74 with SMTP id p71mr218739wma.131.1492032324231; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:25:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.40.65 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:25:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBPs-gbkMg4BDU7+AY9y7GPfNUiVPRPHPqF-CSuYn4m2EA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <601C7C89-F149-4E97-A474-C128041925EA@sn3rd.com> <CABcZeBPs-gbkMg4BDU7+AY9y7GPfNUiVPRPHPqF-CSuYn4m2EA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 17:25:23 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgQzK4vMKSUax+=DO=mXWwFXt9xyWiXW2wmnJq30U7unrg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, LURK BoF <lurk@ietf.org>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c074aaaae023f054cfed83c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lurk/f0CElQ_t3YMjb3qFEro9xs33Tus>
Subject: Re: [Lurk] [TLS] WG Call for adoption of draft-rescorla-tls-subcerts
X-BeenThere: lurk@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Limited Use of Remote Keys <lurk.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lurk>, <mailto:lurk-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lurk/>
List-Post: <mailto:lurk@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lurk-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lurk>, <mailto:lurk-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 21:25:28 -0000

Likewise.

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

> Unsurprisingly, I favor adopting this draft.
>
> -Ekr
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> At our IETF 98 session, there was support in the room to adopt
>> draft-rescorla-tls-subcerts [0].  We need to confirm this support on the
>> list so please let the list know whether you support adoption of the draft
>> and are willing to review/comment on the draft before 20170429.  If you
>> object to its adoption, please let us know why.
>>
>> Clearly, the WG is going to need to work through the trade-offs between
>> short-lived certificates and sub-certs because both seem, to some, to be
>> addressing the same problem.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> J&S
>>
>> [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-rescorla-tls-subcerts
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lurk mailing list
>> Lurk@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lurk
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email