IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lurk] [TLS] WG Call for adoption of draft-rescorla-tls-subcerts

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 13 April 2017 14:23 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: lurk@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lurk@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB33129481 for <lurk@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 07:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2ewr-82BV1hn for <lurk@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 07:23:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9CDA129469 for <lurk@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 07:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E71300431 for <lurk@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:23:19 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Q71s_tbmo4iv for <lurk@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:23:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.home (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0568300261; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:23:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <29A92F48-525F-4166-B8E7-1C1F57DBF259@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_115CADCC-ECF9-4045-9618-383C115EC152"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:23:17 -0400
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR15MB14551FA3148E159F49CD6ECCB6020@MWHPR15MB1455.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: IETF TLS <tls@ietf.org>, IETF LURK <lurk@ietf.org>
To: Subodh Iyengar <subodh@fb.com>
References: <601C7C89-F149-4E97-A474-C128041925EA@sn3rd.com> <CABcZeBPs-gbkMg4BDU7+AY9y7GPfNUiVPRPHPqF-CSuYn4m2EA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgQzK4vMKSUax+=DO=mXWwFXt9xyWiXW2wmnJq30U7unrg@mail.gmail.com> <EBBA47F7-F521-429B-903A-CDF4F1111FDA@vigilsec.com> <MWHPR15MB14551FA3148E159F49CD6ECCB6020@MWHPR15MB1455.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lurk/gccbofBt6Q2Ub1X_-StEiRXchhs>
Subject: Re: [Lurk] [TLS] WG Call for adoption of draft-rescorla-tls-subcerts
X-BeenThere: lurk@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Limited Use of Remote Keys <lurk.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lurk>, <mailto:lurk-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lurk/>
List-Post: <mailto:lurk@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lurk-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lurk>, <mailto:lurk-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 14:23:21 -0000

Subodh:

> 
> @Russ there's some discussion about comparison with proxy certs in the current draft. 
> 

Yes, I saw the list of bullets in Section 5.  I think that a TLS-specific delegation is a good idea, but I do not agree with all of the points into bullets.  That said, we should not be having that discussion as part of the decision to adopt or not.

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email