[Lwip] lwig-terminology-03

[Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]>]

On Mar 31, 2013, at 12:34, Charles Palmer <[e-mail]> wrote:

> I've read the new draft and offer some suggestions, mostly editorial, but there are a couple of other constraints that I think might merit mentioning (particularly regularory), and a couple of questions I have embedded in the text. The edited version is here:

Thanks, those suggestions did allow me to improve the text.  
I've left out the specific reference to EN 300 220-1 (assuming that was what you meant), but did add a bit of reference to regulatory issues (since we aren't defining terminology for them, a little reminder of them is all that is needed).
I already had changed all the lists that summarize the class numbers into tables; I was wondering whether examples in those tables help or give the impression the examples are the definition.  In the end I did add the examples to the Ex table.

I'm not sure we want to give too many examples for how the various classes go together; this would be ratholing quickly, and I trust readers will have enough phantasy to do this on their own.

So this makes the -03, just submitted:

Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-terminology-03
Diff:            http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lwig-terminology-03

In separate news, I've also added Ari Keränen as a co-author, who has supplied and edited some of the power text.

Grüße, Carsten