[Lwip] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-08: (with COMMENT)
Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 04 April 2022 17:42 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 999F93A0E84; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 10:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp@ietf.org, lwig-chairs@ietf.org, lwip@ietf.org, mohit.m.sethi@ericsson.com, mohit.m.sethi@ericsson.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.46.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <164909414260.31261.13253029039130358420@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2022 10:42:22 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lwip/7G8FThc558nt4V1Rb2e137w1M2o>
Subject: [Lwip] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Lightweight IP stack. Official mailing list for IETF LWIG Working Group." <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lwip/>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2022 17:42:23 -0000
Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks to Bob Briscoe for the TSVART review. Sec 2.1. I find it odd that a node implementing IPSec is overburdened by generating a random number, but this is not my domain. Sec 3. Bob and the authors had an interesting discussion on time-based SN and replay windows. It seems to me that the best way to do this would be for the receiver to keep a replay window of some number of packets rather than SNs. The receiver would then store the last, say, 10 packet SNs regardless of how many SNs that covered. This would avoid all the issues with the sender skipping many SNs.
- [Lwip] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-l… Martin Duke via Datatracker
- Re: [Lwip] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ie… Daniel Migault