[Lwip] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lwig-security-protocol-comparison-02.txt

internet-drafts@ietf.org Wed, 02 January 2019 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89B1126CB6; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 06:20:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: lwip@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.89.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: lwip@ietf.org
Message-ID: <154643882367.32567.7074409918578873791@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2019 06:20:23 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lwip/DBLU7GuwA41gZidwl2e-yxuzEHc>
Subject: [Lwip] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lwig-security-protocol-comparison-02.txt
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Lightweight IP stack. Official mailing list for IETF LWIG Working Group." <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lwip/>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2019 14:20:24 -0000

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Light-Weight Implementation Guidance WG of the IETF.

        Title           : Comparison of CoAP Security Protocols
        Authors         : John Mattsson
                          Francesca Palombini
	Filename        : draft-ietf-lwig-security-protocol-comparison-02.txt
	Pages           : 15
	Date            : 2019-01-02

   This document analyzes and compares per-packet message size overheads
   when using different security protocols to secure CoAP.  The analyzed
   security protocols are DTLS 1.2, DTLS 1.3, TLS 1.2, TLS 1.3, and
   OSCORE.  DTLS and TLS are analyzed with and without 6LoWPAN-GHC
   compression.  DTLS is analyzed with and without Connection ID.

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:

There are also htmlized versions available at:

A diff from the previous version is available at:

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: