Re: [Lwip] [T2TRG] QUIC on IoT boards

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Mon, 20 January 2020 09:56 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E07931200E0 for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 01:56:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tcuZmRZZPYJi for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 01:56:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs25.mail.saunalahti.fi (vs25.mail.saunalahti.fi [62.142.117.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 576201200E3 for <lwip@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 01:56:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs25.mail.saunalahti.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vs25.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B962076D; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:56:10 +0200 (EET)
Received: from gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi (gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi [195.197.172.115]) by vs25.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DCAE20C71; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:56:10 +0200 (EET)
Received: from eggert.org (unknown [62.248.255.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: eggert@elisanet.fi) by gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5A874004C; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:56:06 +0200 (EET)
Received: from stickers.eggert.org (stickers.eggert.org [172.24.110.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22D9860055A; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:55:49 +0200 (EET)
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <88D2B34D-750A-4A35-8F1E-02EB3B189CF1@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_46A95313-904F-4EAB-AD83-368470E2AE11"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\))
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:55:48 +0200
In-Reply-To: <522D72C3-537B-4FB9-BA28-4191DE7462F5@arm.com>
Cc: "lwip@ietf.org" <lwip@ietf.org>, "t2trg@irtf.org" <t2trg@irtf.org>
To: Thomas Fossati <Thomas.Fossati@arm.com>
References: <6CB4D459-4AAA-4313-B95C-05DF22C9A9DD@eggert.org> <522D72C3-537B-4FB9-BA28-4191DE7462F5@arm.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: 22D9860055A.A4D64
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lwip/G1eAxInVYI01ZxbxOMlqvJvArMA>
Subject: Re: [Lwip] [T2TRG] QUIC on IoT boards
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Lightweight IP stack. Official mailing list for IETF LWIG Working Group." <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lwip/>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 09:56:19 -0000

Hi,

On 2020-1-20, at 11:52, Thomas Fossati <Thomas.Fossati@arm.com> wrote:
> It'd be nice to evaluate the QUIC stack against CoAP/DTLS on a sample of the typical interactions, e.g.:
> - streaming sensor measurements (device to cloud;  long-lived, more or less sparse)
> - firmware updates (cloud to device; bulky)
> - device management (bidirectional; typically lightweight)

yes, lots more effort is needed to analyze different scenarios, and to improve the code. The "future work" section is lengthy for a reason :-)

> I'd be happy to help out with the characterisation, as well as the practicalities.

Thanks for the offer!

One possibility could be to gather interested people during the Vancouver hackathon and chat? I am normally at the QUIC table, but could defect for a few hours...

Lars