IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lwip] Fwd: Re: (initial triage - final disposition with rev-02) Re: Fwd: Review of draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations-00 by crypto review panel

Olaf Bergmann <bergmann@tzi.org> Wed, 12 December 2018 09:37 UTC

Return-Path: <bergmann@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1979412777C for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 01:37:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wjQLOpky1y5K for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 01:37:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A857812F1A5 for <lwip@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 01:37:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wangari.tzi.org (dynamic-218-247.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.218.247]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40E32204F6; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 10:37:36 +0100 (CET)
From: Olaf Bergmann <bergmann@tzi.org>
To: Mohit Sethi M <mohit.m.sethi@ericsson.com>
Cc: "lwip@ietf.org" <lwip@ietf.org>
References: <CAMr0u6nKw0aKJSm6100XayC+k4bPV1tNPnO2Ji9Jzo4C=PkA9w@mail.gmail.com> <fd7d0cab-90dd-b5b6-471f-61ac05461725@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 10:37:36 +0100
Message-ID: <878t0vkrvj.fsf@tzi.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lwip/emebmb05g01FLBhd8eaWy-BnAl0>
Subject: Re: [Lwip] Fwd: Re: (initial triage - final disposition with rev-02) Re: Fwd: Review of draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations-00 by crypto review panel
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Lightweight IP stack. Official mailing list for IETF LWIG Working Group." <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lwip/>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 09:37:40 -0000

Mohit Sethi M <mohit.m.sethi@ericsson.com> writes:

> The reason why LWIG working group has lwip@ietf.org as its list
> address is not something that I can answer. This was much before my
> term as a co-chair started.

lwip was the name of the BOF. [1]
As a result of the BOF, a working group for writing up a guidance
document was formed and the name was changed accordingly. [2]
The mailing list was never migrated, though.

[1] Light-Weight IP Protocol Design, IETF79
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/79/materials/minutes-79-lwip

[2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lwip/FG4YlFcBSzlzoJBND7RipUM_RMk

Grüße
Olaf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email