IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lwip] WGLC review of draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks

Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com> Wed, 05 June 2019 10:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 736951200CD; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 03:36:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zNwD9JmYWEho; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 03:36:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR04-DB3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr60065.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.6.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47941120649; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 03:36:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=4cFAl2Uzc3wk1ZvXJmCOhlEa3zy+DhvgtdbyuRcBdtc=; b=g5wdF4HwZn4lWC4U00EceAGXac0JpcTKjqSvsPxRMpnVQvyrWIPth4yQKDWOHr72LngHrOCgeO2mRsHnDLV0J+SWVZMJ55veKQReubvqjQo18fiWsyLf+eRZcxvKIsGA/CZayyxGGS/8j8g6IHJ3ivZGIiFGL02y7r48dTDdntQ=
Received: from HE1PR07MB4425.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (20.176.167.142) by HE1PR07MB4220.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (20.176.166.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1965.12; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 10:36:00 +0000
Received: from HE1PR07MB4425.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::802b:5182:975c:99da]) by HE1PR07MB4425.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::802b:5182:975c:99da%3]) with mapi id 15.20.1965.011; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 10:36:00 +0000
From: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
To: Carles Gomez Montenegro <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>
CC: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>, "lwip@ietf.org" <lwip@ietf.org>, "jon.crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk" <jon.crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk>, Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [Lwip] WGLC review of draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks
Thread-Index: AdUFoNWJ0yX8rjm/R0SxdahRUHAdrAV4RskAAAIZvSA=
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2019 10:36:00 +0000
Message-ID: <HE1PR07MB4425BB9F8FFD2D8CA652A0AEC2160@HE1PR07MB4425.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <HE1PR07MB4425FA59013C58026105671DC2320@HE1PR07MB4425.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <f27dbc582fcf1b8c39fcedf00eb653d8.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <f27dbc582fcf1b8c39fcedf00eb653d8.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu>
Accept-Language: sv-SE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com;
x-originating-ip: [192.176.1.80]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 7f94b2d8-74b1-412d-018b-08d6e9a19a25
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(49563074)(7193020); SRVR:HE1PR07MB4220;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: HE1PR07MB4220:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <HE1PR07MB422062794CBCB2A4A3D8D42EC2160@HE1PR07MB4220.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:4941;
x-forefront-prvs: 00594E8DBA
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(136003)(39860400002)(366004)(396003)(376002)(346002)(13464003)(51914003)(189003)(199004)(14454004)(25786009)(966005)(14444005)(256004)(99936001)(9686003)(71190400001)(478600001)(15974865002)(68736007)(66574012)(74316002)(71200400001)(2171002)(53936002)(81166006)(54906003)(6246003)(107886003)(4326008)(6116002)(81156014)(3846002)(8676002)(99286004)(76176011)(7696005)(8936002)(33656002)(66476007)(76116006)(66946007)(6306002)(316002)(66616009)(73956011)(53546011)(86362001)(6506007)(305945005)(6436002)(2906002)(229853002)(7736002)(55016002)(6916009)(446003)(5660300002)(102836004)(11346002)(66446008)(66066001)(52536014)(476003)(186003)(66556008)(64756008)(26005)(486006); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:HE1PR07MB4220; H:HE1PR07MB4425.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ericsson.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 30wXeizIGfHgm2yp8G8rg5kobnmln0US3Hr1OO0ixCk61nKHwdoGdiYD/vNiifSG35l6csMHDFGuhyXPMt5kvZFu2DUAn9EhFflY9f30oQ4/RFCvisEee5d1BybPb6FOCKiJvxlVAloC8aTlDjDezDtj7dTPm9jiCSsdAgcll/gPlq4gc79ALyIu4CoBbWqHqrM/aGj0txn9nl0x2/TVh4sG+m3qqNNl1+8yHrRRocmef3EyDjtMupYJT07XRklpwfMKSVTMDsBVrhVJ+cD/ic+QYIW4UXQKDEtkn4Td+4Iojz98Rvb4ptgDdiu7GpA90OXSEt6L3B453JmsQIBflaV1lV6IQbqANgHc/TnU7s0ivMVTPEBd0LmFf6snlz5MG/giO88jJ+mPFdhRpbG6POQ3/M/k/gPFm8OYTXRAlMc=
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="SHA1"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_055C_01D51B9B.3A686A60"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 7f94b2d8-74b1-412d-018b-08d6e9a19a25
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Jun 2019 10:36:00.2807 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1PR07MB4220
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lwip/MUcjtjRmHwW-hXDegRiXB2C9L50>
Subject: Re: [Lwip] WGLC review of draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Lightweight IP stack. Official mailing list for IETF LWIG Working Group." <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lwip/>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2019 10:36:08 -0000

Hi
And thanks for the update, the added text looks very good

/Ingemar

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carles Gomez Montenegro <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>
> Sent: den 5 juni 2019 11:35
> To: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
> Cc: tcpm@ietf.org; lwip@ietf.org; jon.crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk
> Subject: Re: [Lwip] WGLC review of draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-
> networks
> 
> Hi Ingemar,
> 
> Thank you very much for reviewing the draft and for your suggestions. Your
> feedback is timely and very welcome.
> 
> Based on your comments, in the last revision of our document (-08) we have
> added a new subsection (subsection 4.3.3) that discusses the Initial
Window
> setting in the context of CNNs.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Carles (on behalf of all authors)
> 
> 
> > Hi
> >
> > I hope that I am not too late with the review.
> >
> > Perhaps this has been brought up earlier, and it that is the case then
> > sorry for kicking in open doors.
> >
> >
> >
> > I have read but to not seen any mention of the initial congestion
> > window size. Today the initial window in most TCP stacks is set to
> > 10*MSS and this may well be used by Nb-IoT implementers that are
> > unaware of default settings.
> >
> > While this is likely not an issue if he applications transmit small
> > objects that fit in a few segments, it can become an issue with larger
> > object transfers and if a burst of 14600 bytes overflows a tiny
> > network buffer.
> >
> > Should this be addressed, possibly with a recommendation to adjust the
> > initial window based on network constraints ?
> >
> >
> >
> > /Ingemar
> >
> > ==================================
> >
> > Ingemar Johansson  M.Sc.
> >
> > Master Researcher
> >
> >
> >
> > Ericsson Research
> >
> > Network Protocols & E2E Performance
> >
> > Labratoriegränd 11
> >
> > 971 28, Luleå, Sweden
> >
> > Phone +46-1071 43042
> >
> > SMS/MMS +46-73 078 3289
> >
> > ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com
> >
> > www.ericsson.com
> >
> >
> >
> >                 Nothing to stop this
> >
> >              being the best day ever
> >
> >                             U2
> >
> > ==================================
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Lwip mailing list
> > Lwip@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
> >
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email