Re: [Lwip] The LWIG WG has placed draft-gomez-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 11 August 2017 11:51 UTC

Return-Path: <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1CE613267C; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 04:51:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9JqwUqxvqIPC; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 04:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x242.google.com (mail-io0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9E03132672; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 04:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x242.google.com with SMTP id c74so3297135iod.4; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 04:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=fcNSOvdgX9SaGfjvdZXSwf81fKxi6sGgTsmT1YZ2Ztk=; b=IY9DPurka6rTApMHuC86pvGwp5+uJNxtxdFzBl1MRwhmbovs6Nevd6nrBx8esngXuU s7wvGGBTiVuHLkqi4BYhYp5ttVS/a7y5c/krZ8VSfwYxmUxF3Sz4qo9PV5liAe1PkhUi vKtSHrAhuyN5G7Yh9Qa99VOrkDJNLdQj/LLesddgJ4OREDRXSSqqxaQwUyeciuFD1EUe 6ZApSGX3WG0tuRjdQezFEuxfkzx7/QYTB8LSPMHli73PqkJXIg9pMMoVWeRWhQ84PeRM vILeQ8LLC9VbQO6OCHzaMGtdojtQReSUXeCikWddYlDoZAssVNZBNuSsXXXxbEl/0mD+ bknA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=fcNSOvdgX9SaGfjvdZXSwf81fKxi6sGgTsmT1YZ2Ztk=; b=dsQt8v+HkjQ4tXYU1PQoWKIMmsHmMSK2kgLlVwm8zjzMsd0NEZMV8Czzl8XpvUpwIb sVO8yRatjEwt0byvtQvBErxXzaJHDWy/XnCjawCs/tbI3/Y5tFaW5H+aDeXebCoZZbJI 8smhUiNs+9JoDQcYvAlmZoUJnlxe+qDJsEN6K3rwJ2lSZrABQV4iTHL0wNjIDe/30X9g U6CvkMIVOB3L0/jVIafuizhdhJj4HSBhdgYgaTNTZskFWDMjS/bthyl7hsucB4tYkI/V hxsJyVmjZBbRP6R2SWeJYRx1J6N+16VuWIecKkr0RwmL07vTtkZx4eBTqYe9fcQJ5VHs bP+g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5ivQZ6C7xo/zEmI8Zy0vS4TEjRVczwrNMK8jwVmpTwhaIo2mtvN jsYSRJQ8LlwkZqMj
X-Received: by 10.107.130.151 with SMTP id m23mr11946683ioi.156.1502452292845; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 04:51:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ubuntu-1604-lts.c.rjtmp-165304.internal (53.84.197.104.bc.googleusercontent.com. [104.197.84.53]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 189sm326685ioz.29.2017.08.11.04.51.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Aug 2017 04:51:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Rahul Jadhav <nyrahul@ubuntu-1604-lts.c.rjtmp-165304.internal>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:51:26 +0000
To: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
cc: lwip@ietf.org, draft-gomez-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks@ietf.org, lwig-chairs@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <150244049008.24539.2047022811282177643.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1708111144110.7202@ubuntu-1604-lts.c.rjtmp-165304.internal>
References: <150244049008.24539.2047022811282177643.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lwip/r5atsybk7pldGXrHJ-A6AFnQcDs>
Subject: Re: [Lwip] The LWIG WG has placed draft-gomez-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight IP stack <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lwip/>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:51:36 -0000

+1
I ve reviewed two versions of this draft and I feel that the work is 
relevant and will be useful for implementors. It incorporates design 
traits of different open sources which will help in design choices.

Will continue reading/reviewing this work in the future.

On Fri, 11 Aug 2017, IETF Secretariat wrote:

>
> The LWIG WG has placed draft-gomez-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks in state
> Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Zhen Cao)
>
> The document is available at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gomez-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks/
>
> Comment:
> The document has received sufficient support of adoption at both IETF98 and
> IETF99 meetings.  The document has got many reviews with comments and
> questions, which is good because many people care.  The call would like to
> confirm that this document is heading at the right direction, and can be
> served as the basis for future work.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lwip mailing list
> Lwip@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
>