Re: [Lwip] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations-19: (with DISCUSS)

Rene Struik <rstruik.ext@gmail.com> Thu, 18 February 2021 01:40 UTC

Return-Path: <rstruik.ext@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149133A1EBF; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 17:40:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HKKiHVUw5HbJ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 17:40:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72a.google.com (mail-qk1-x72a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94E303A1EBC; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 17:40:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72a.google.com with SMTP id t63so752814qkc.1; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 17:40:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=lCD126tjy0wnI66+ecw07zsuGtAMoKnl+DvLO70wdNI=; b=sDgwqX0tiB0R/UhRudnVOR+pG0lrdblxBQ+IPe+apGjtzoJJHaMhLc8LtrD6Gt3G/L vZa7dRUrKkQW24QYsQyr+8c8ZFDTwSMY9vJ95PQ6YVX/D1Ofh07ONF7PS538oT7DYdqM 7wib0wzMcP8+kBJ9764qsKzlhTSd+etstl9JmrSfoO30lO/eVsN/ZlsTIN/OY1EtCbGw 9atsoEHFb4E0A5ohpEW2n1kH+QGEeJYmIvUYq/cMGUPG8qYu+BFPuhD8Z7s4MRgr2cko Q/HCXzATynzNTaCqDcVR7B9h+XS4MK97OackWv4bm2GE5JyaQSRaBbWYgxJHvGoP8P23 kPKQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=lCD126tjy0wnI66+ecw07zsuGtAMoKnl+DvLO70wdNI=; b=isT2ljai9bXumoFGh9OMZUHN04sGo9vWeAjDiuIrnvWdwN7TjR+gRRWT6S3Ts4VZQ8 7vHtPh270X/anChfNpb1vcT78JBvenVSZsEP/vP26Lyt6aaKuEIcjz6pGcC2iFpjaYCc vwU+KWch9B5zZkTg6d4vVXtTiBc2Vl4Q8mgUoYtng0d2VHbJ7fPJpjO+j4wWQpkmN13B TSbgT62wHnzQcaUy3HsawXGaD/FKl35aIHjq0uM0QB2dIWILpZbzKwEmvrVqGOyQeqsZ 0ltNEIh+3Gxfb+jpbSSyTXWHnMBh4tVAflCEulmrkMZddxoseVCpit1oG7n/ut9Sshe5 am3Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530jgMSOCz16IXDZybqWyrieSJEivn1vLMNB+Bs9kKDLNHKQVKw2 TsMu0t8uk/kBo3oo4x7+sTTfem5uMjc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyT7Dkgf5pSyesb6CFrW6tWO0Vz1Qs5WSzjbL9zFKthORmDGwNaUDS9zt/hHBn1cy4D4zQH9A==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:15a7:: with SMTP id f7mr2179928qkk.476.1613612414342; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 17:40:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2607:fea8:8a0:1397:757a:51c7:ccf3:200? ([2607:fea8:8a0:1397:757a:51c7:ccf3:200]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v30sm2432637qte.26.2021.02.17.17.40.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Feb 2021 17:40:13 -0800 (PST)
To: Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>, Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, "lwip@ietf.org" <lwip@ietf.org>, Mohit Sethi M <mohit.m.sethi@ericsson.com>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "lwig-chairs@ietf.org" <lwig-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations@ietf.org>
References: <161356897308.14208.11423622413442209985@ietfa.amsl.com> <116cb13e-22f1-4686-61c3-7b556eea730c@gmail.com> <635aa9d5e4692752f0e9ea4e1293c99b1885f379.camel@ericsson.com> <f0502e89-9e87-769e-52f5-996043c3d97a@gmail.com> <CAMGpriXwoqyUN2f9ogUBYRoTZcSZXKBXX7eVuUUGVAJ8meGP9Q@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR15MB237930693AC8E3D83873FC47E3859@DM6PR15MB2379.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
From: Rene Struik <rstruik.ext@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <a83a2d13-1400-5be8-f8c5-4afc9d0e9a2e@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 20:40:12 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR15MB237930693AC8E3D83873FC47E3859@DM6PR15MB2379.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------5E8166D340D4B42CF7CAAB11"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lwip/rA078udwuVfy2-myc4tTx4fII-s>
Subject: Re: [Lwip] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations-19: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Lightweight IP stack. Official mailing list for IETF LWIG Working Group." <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lwip/>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 01:40:18 -0000

Thanks Daniel!


On 2021-02-17 8:33 p.m., Daniel Migault wrote:

> I personally do not see at that stage a clear advantage of adding 
> another round to secdispatch and - again speaking only for myself - I 
> would prefer at that point to see the document being moved forward in 
> lwig with the status that enables all IANA registration.
>
> Yours,
> Daniel
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Lwip <lwip-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Erik Kline 
> <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 17, 2021 7:10 PM
> *To:* Rene Struik <rstruik.ext@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>; 
> lwip@ietf.org <lwip@ietf.org>; Mohit Sethi M 
> <mohit.m.sethi@ericsson.com>; iesg@ietf.org <iesg@ietf.org>; 
> lwig-chairs@ietf.org <lwig-chairs@ietf.org>; 
> draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations@ietf.org 
> <draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Lwip] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on 
> draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations-19: (with DISCUSS)
> I think Magnus's DISCUSS points all make sense, and the process
> failures are mine.  I understand the point that a document this
> crypto-heavy might have a better venue.
>
> I think tomorrow I'd like to get an understanding of the decision tree
> for what to do here.
>
>     - My reading of things is that the decision with the greatest
> impact is probably figuring out a proper home.
>
>     - As for the intended document track, this seems to be largely a
> function of whether there are IANA requests and what specifically is
> requested (vis. Info vs PS), ergo this seems deferrable until other
> decisions have been made.
>
> I'd be interested to hear where specifically folks agree this document
> should go, or perhaps whether it should go to secdispatch first to
> have this question addressed by folks there.
>
> If the consensus is that some version of this document is fine within
> lwig, then changes like extracting the IANA-impacting sections to
> another document in another venue all seem reasonable to me.
>
> Thanks,
> -Erik
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lwip mailing list
> Lwip@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip 
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>


-- 
email: rstruik.ext@gmail.com | Skype: rstruik
cell: +1 (647) 867-5658 | US: +1 (415) 287-3867