Re: [Lwip] [T2TRG] QUIC on IoT boards

Василий Долматов <vdolmatov@gmail.com> Mon, 20 January 2020 14:10 UTC

Return-Path: <vdolmatov@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67CAD120142 for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 06:10:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yo4jDDE-S0rq for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 06:09:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x230.google.com (mail-lj1-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F668120124 for <lwip@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 06:09:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x230.google.com with SMTP id w1so34003680ljh.5 for <lwip@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 06:09:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=CQjWsx04l/lFSYaSChZYVJl1UWXI1DXGhgM5e6wrH70=; b=XLIPB3JXc4SNypx6m4Zej5b2rJ3OHzcFg8uzWkP9bbRdhNJo4gYMk6vTICLZuJh42L Eyr0xtl+B65aY0GqVT1nVTzwncdUzJwclp3zDh/lPFe9dgr+O4STr2MH0rfCzRn6AUao JJxYDZK33hSqD/la+yqvax7vaLS4X6w7+B+MpKWG1G+/lzDBTx3U+uhHM9lRdVCl91xR b4BMunkZaFBD8CPDW8yfQd4O25BcnPTwXe8wPRjlAKRPEdS6CYZzblxRZJgwpVp4Q+Kz hXQet4Rns0XnhXd/wjKnLOvDAUEVJcopmdoG/L3nhfnNcQmD3i37lXCgwcJ6qwyF0Jv+ GwfA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=CQjWsx04l/lFSYaSChZYVJl1UWXI1DXGhgM5e6wrH70=; b=k1l2nuXiCjBdlNzd3zdUlUIh4qxdlobvew9GXoYI2LRR8DAir6GdfX4VP0Q5VSghNK 2rDEkl8tzguLjcSreqPSyycajhaeedaajZIaw7pB6Fo3zmUEvHcSQzhHJ3QbmL5fj6aI Qja6KQ9ik9HxHjemkCJ256bIs6+TitsAoUjROZWRrJgajatG7IGIkz8HMchmzRW/nqq7 Eyjd96DhZQAKJqlg998FkqRwTZQQXZktlixDH2PLFcP4N43oT9Obdqu4aPTdQ3eaRk+o KMfkZSDg9UGkd9LlxLnhKv6d/VkhkVOq4RRyy2YnhAZCXoRg7dwVOpWkIzN4MYFX3r/c 7EMQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVyokKiOLJbK55psUA8s5KJIf7uHOhl8vl4ZiFSLZBDclEY2JXT MmQfbVhiuIK4ak690hR7L4k=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwjbByFcSO3AvIslG9CteE8aCWcC8ge8rnmgOqwQJxj7RvNpdyz4yVe8Pynv2TP1bgkJRUajA==
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:880a:: with SMTP id x10mr13580652ljh.211.1579529393637; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 06:09:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.197.3] ([89.175.23.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y8sm16874066lji.56.2020.01.20.06.09.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Jan 2020 06:09:52 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Василий Долматов <vdolmatov@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <E7C38177-DD0B-4D92-AE0E-EB457691E493@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 17:09:51 +0300
Cc: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, "lwip@ietf.org" <lwip@ietf.org>, "t2trg@irtf.org" <t2trg@irtf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6B9FFEF5-CDC9-4703-BB10-616DBEDE80AB@gmail.com>
References: <6CB4D459-4AAA-4313-B95C-05DF22C9A9DD@eggert.org> <E7C38177-DD0B-4D92-AE0E-EB457691E493@cisco.com>
To: "Eliot Lear (elear)" <elear@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lwip/txzbEiXiwxqj9SJzTvCbOywLlmw>
Subject: Re: [Lwip] [T2TRG] QUIC on IoT boards
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Lightweight IP stack. Official mailing list for IETF LWIG Working Group." <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lwip/>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 14:10:01 -0000


> 20 янв. 2020 г., в 16:45, Eliot Lear (elear) <elear@cisco.com> написал(а):
> 
> Hi Lars,
> 
> A fundamental question to ask is whether which IoT uses QUIC is appropriate for and which ones it is not.  For example, obscuring port information on an industrial device – not to mention encrypting communications – might actually cause more harm than good if the result is an inability to audit industrial automation behavior.  As in: why did that signal turn green that caused two trains to collide?

absence of encryption can cause that sudden «green signal» be created by joking school pupils.

> 
> Be careful what you wish for.  You may not like the results.
> 
> Eliot
>