IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lwip] The LWIG WG has placed draft-mglt-lwig-minimal-esp in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

Zhen Cao <zhencao.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 31 August 2018 11:05 UTC

Return-Path: <zhencao.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15FEB130DDB; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 04:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3DQLIpdYbkVh; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 04:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x230.google.com (mail-oi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BC301277D2; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 04:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x230.google.com with SMTP id x197-v6so20980646oix.5; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 04:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RjgsIYg7bLW/EiQBV+rsjTlG4oAX168b52i5Bpw+E8E=; b=migVTLFRQEPLCFAQfZb6lzvNVs+Tf/lE7Pxt8MGHRM8cinRcQl+7XEFuo/idR6ciei zmqF4FBpz09E9ZNXyTYpOx9pTSEx9a9LJtiadxvp3TjRBCc0pbiNjqwQOxghVTBr+qAf ac/USv52a/g8jalQbSWc6jXZnH9GvuPP6F3DVa9KGZZpOrPZmKzXCLcpiv2Ng2qehPkk 1JSi6qWII5lFR9441sl8AC8KGrDPhLcD1m55CgDpMNnrZMgAGJmKWCItSAg+2aOhu/dx BmUaSsd37CjImUOWegEjmay2puEJNXejC5oy4ZkZgrnlROlS6pCObUN7PMWg0fPudHYy WK3w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RjgsIYg7bLW/EiQBV+rsjTlG4oAX168b52i5Bpw+E8E=; b=ugxFWo8T/HuqoSJaHiEyGMXfgldvRO3/LVewYc4f0234/gy9lYwOHT23H1Vaqyv/Ew XuU6X0B+zPmWGWPCnrzcowr1E6SiNEIg5N+s4jvxirBQthBinQpSexPd4YP4gzljsOIm 8llwDWcDCPF1D3DNNAo+9/QNstox1/uLE4wSWE3N6LCp2j4bL8olymTQ2x0bEuLGgGig 3rZ9axCc3f3JUpLBqDvrvnUho+2WJ3ssekhW3OYfQjDiRqKwueTmtOJUGkcugSBW1som 7wYupQHf2iPPCOf3bELTV1omVKGecTV2+d4uTVz1b5uwYdbkDdedwhRTOEOQZJMgOo7z /w+A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51A5S+NoKL41TxrTnacnzkkHnvb0aepakk3/laPpYX9sd0RK/7dk r7XXYBqiXP4WNgH00oImWnqBWiNTFwKi7zujtcc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYtN+NTuDdqqoqGrf7GsxPDO8WVLaMPAjF1TFOgCOCAixvr9vM1nYJKR43Q0l2GS/6hEi2hDcXTeX7xeOvSRyo=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:2111:: with SMTP id 17-v6mr6212891oiz.241.1535713521803; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 04:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAP_kZQqckPJhCn083sg8=PVpiO_+Ke=GhOKre=qujkk4k=dU7A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP_kZQqckPJhCn083sg8=PVpiO_+Ke=GhOKre=qujkk4k=dU7A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Zhen Cao <zhencao.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 19:04:58 +0800
Message-ID: <CAFxP68zOd5nfa-3R34bSDFctHFebap_42fAfkC_NJ=a_mU_MxQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: heinrich.ietf@gmail.com
Cc: lwip@ietf.org, ipsec@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lwip/zHjTxJ4c-kNDt45XojkXKv6hJhU>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 04:06:40 -0700
Subject: Re: [Lwip] The LWIG WG has placed draft-mglt-lwig-minimal-esp in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Lightweight IP stack. Official mailing list for IETF LWIG Working Group." <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lwip/>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 11:05:24 -0000

Hello Heinrich,

Thanks for your review and comments.  See my comments&questions to
confirm inline.

> I don't know why IETF would publish this document when they have rfc 6973.
This draft has much content not stated in RFC6973 (which is a general
recommendation) , e.g., overhead analysis /delay/handshake performance
analysis.

> I want to see some actual performance from a real ESP implementation where privacy is protected and energy is saved by tweaking the TFC and how often dummy packet is sent.

Are you saying that you would like to see more implementation guidance
other than what's been already provided?  or do you think the current
recommendations are unreasonable?

Btw, sharing the implementation code is encouraged but not mandatory
in IETF.  We by default trust the authors because they are foremost
responsible for their work (particularly informational ones).

Best regards,
Zhen
>
> Ciao
> Heinrich
> _______________________________________________
> Lwip mailing list
> Lwip@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email