Re: [magma] Question about IGMP host implementation

Bharat Joshi <bharat_joshi@infosys.com> Wed, 12 October 2011 11:25 UTC

Return-Path: <bharat_joshi@infosys.com>
X-Original-To: magma@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: magma@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727E821F84DB for <magma@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 04:25:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nNChQ7ntHcER for <magma@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 04:25:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from KECGATE03.infosys.com (kecgate03.infosys.com [122.98.10.31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 367FD21F84D2 for <magma@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 04:25:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-TM-IMSS-Message-ID: <dc35c33c00040064@infosys.com>
Received: from blrkechub03.ad.infosys.com ([10.66.236.43]) by infosys.com ([122.98.10.31]) with ESMTP (TREND IMSS SMTP Service 7.1) id dc35c33c00040064 ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:54:27 +0530
Received: from BLRKECMBX02.ad.infosys.com ([10.66.236.22]) by blrkechub03.ad.infosys.com ([10.66.236.43]) with mapi; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:54:36 +0530
From: Bharat Joshi <bharat_joshi@infosys.com>
To: Indranil Bhattacharya <myselfindranil@gmail.com>, Kunal Shah <kunal.shah@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:53:27 +0530
Thread-Topic: [magma] Question about IGMP host implementation
Thread-Index: AcyIudBczRqs4ScsTHG0vVMrRn63dwAF4xuv
Message-ID: <31D55C4D55BEED48A4459EB64567589A1186EB24EA@BLRKECMBX02.ad.infosys.com>
References: <4FD1E7CD248BF84F86BD4814EDDDBCC151401F3936@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>, <CAAaur94CuNmHY398Uj6K1JLkrDjEQxHEvjyqCkVU7+EKFwg8uQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAaur94CuNmHY398Uj6K1JLkrDjEQxHEvjyqCkVU7+EKFwg8uQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "magma@ietf.org" <magma@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [magma] Question about IGMP host implementation
X-BeenThere: magma@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast and Anycast Group Membership <magma.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/magma>, <mailto:magma-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/magma>
List-Post: <mailto:magma@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:magma-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma>, <mailto:magma-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:25:38 -0000

How is a switch has two different subnets on its two ports? Typically switch divides the broadcast domain. Right?

Regards,
Bharat
________________________________________
From: magma-bounces@ietf.org [magma-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Indranil Bhattacharya [myselfindranil@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 2:05 PM
To: Kunal Shah
Cc: magma@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [magma] Question about IGMP host implementation

Hi Kunal,

             Yes it should. The scenario that I have in mind is a switch whose mrouter interface is in vlanA and igmp joins are received on an interface in vlanB. In this case, query coming from vlanA(different subnet) has to be answered by hosts in vlanB.

Thanks,
Indranil

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:08 AM, Kunal Shah <kunal.shah@ericsson.com<mailto:kunal.shah@ericsson.com>> wrote:
Hi all,

Can an IGMPv2 host respond to a general query originated from a subnet other then its own?? RFC 2236 states:

""query received" occurs when the host receives either a valid
     General Membership Query message, or a valid Group-Specific
     Membership Query message.  To be valid, the Query message must be
     at least 8 octets long, and have a correct IGMP checksum.  The
     group address in the IGMP header must either be zero (a General
     Query) or a valid multicast group address (a Group-Specific Query)"

There is no requirement for the source address to be on the same subnet as the host.

Thanks,
Kunal


_______________________________________________
magma mailing list
magma@ietf.org<mailto:magma@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma



**************** CAUTION - Disclaimer *****************
This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely 
for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please 
notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are not 
to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other person and 
any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken 
every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for any damage 
you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry out your 
own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves the 
right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail 
address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the 
Infosys e-mail system.
***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS***