Re: [magma] Destination address in v2 leave message

Bharat Joshi <bharat_joshi@infosys.com> Fri, 14 October 2011 01:56 UTC

Return-Path: <bharat_joshi@infosys.com>
X-Original-To: magma@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: magma@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFAC121F8ACE for <magma@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:56:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sRuRjQtLBGDo for <magma@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:56:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from KECGATE08.infosys.com (kecgate08.infosysconsulting.com [122.98.10.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8ED21F8AD3 for <magma@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-TM-IMSS-Message-ID: <5b03ef140006a724@infosys.com>
Received: from blrkechub03.ad.infosys.com ([10.66.236.43]) by infosys.com ([122.98.10.33]) with ESMTP (TREND IMSS SMTP Service 7.1) id 5b03ef140006a724 ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 07:33:15 +0530
Received: from BLRKECMBX02.ad.infosys.com ([10.66.236.22]) by blrkechub03.ad.infosys.com ([10.66.236.43]) with mapi; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 07:25:25 +0530
From: Bharat Joshi <bharat_joshi@infosys.com>
To: Indranil Bhattacharya <myselfindranil@gmail.com>, Kunal Shah <kunal.shah@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 07:23:31 +0530
Thread-Topic: [magma] Destination address in v2 leave message
Thread-Index: AcyJ54/SgXXV6IZLRFGSZKhHnbwv9wALIMG7
Message-ID: <31D55C4D55BEED48A4459EB64567589A1186EB24F1@BLRKECMBX02.ad.infosys.com>
References: <CAAaur97Rhfy5=SYsji8appmHcesVQzOP8y_X2sFkUnw7ZQmGLg@mail.gmail.com> <4FD1E7CD248BF84F86BD4814EDDDBCC151402959E6@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>, <CAAaur97X9p5TUR6nwhL3V09Dtp4L+BxOQoHWnuaLXwyeUXBvyg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAaur97X9p5TUR6nwhL3V09Dtp4L+BxOQoHWnuaLXwyeUXBvyg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "magma@ietf.org" <magma@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [magma] Destination address in v2 leave message
X-BeenThere: magma@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast and Anycast Group Membership <magma.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/magma>, <mailto:magma-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/magma>
List-Post: <mailto:magma@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:magma-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma>, <mailto:magma-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:56:33 -0000

Hi Kunal/Indranil,

         Leave message is sent to ALL-Routers address because host does not keep track of the querier.

         If host needs to keep track of querier, it will have to implement querier election algorithm and maintain a state with querier-timeout etc. which is unnecessary.

Regards,
Bharat
________________________________________
From: magma-bounces@ietf.org [magma-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Indranil Bhattacharya [myselfindranil@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 2:05 AM
To: Kunal Shah
Cc: magma@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [magma] Destination address in v2 leave message

Hi Kunal,

            Non-queriers lower the group timers upon receiving group-specific query from querier. They always ignore leave messages. Please refer the last state diagram in section 7 which is for non-querier.

Thanks,
Indranil

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Kunal Shah <kunal.shah@ericsson.com<mailto:kunal.shah@ericsson.com>> wrote:
Non-querier does process the leave message. On receiving a leave the non-querier is going to reduce the group timer to [Max Response Time] in the packet * [Last Member Query Count] but will not send the leave. Please refer to section 7 of RFC 2236.

________________________________
From: magma-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:magma-bounces@ietf.org> [mailto:magma-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:magma-bounces@ietf.org>] On Behalf Of Indranil Bhattacharya
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 10:30 AM
To: magma@ietf.org<mailto:magma@ietf.org>
Subject: [magma] Destination address in v2 leave message

Hi,

    Can anyone please tell me the disadvantage of using queriers address as destination address in v2 leave message? Is there any advantage of sending it to 224.0.0.2? Non-querier never processes leave message anyway.

Thanks,
Indranil


**************** CAUTION - Disclaimer *****************
This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely 
for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please 
notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are not 
to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other person and 
any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken 
every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for any damage 
you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry out your 
own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves the 
right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail 
address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the 
Infosys e-mail system.
***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS***