[magma] Question about fast-leave implementation
Kunal Shah <kunal.shah@ericsson.com> Thu, 28 October 2010 22:45 UTC
Return-Path: <kunal.shah@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: magma@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: magma@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ABE53A67BE for <magma@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:45:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.313
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.313 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.715, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8kTirIN+DXrB for <magma@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imr4.ericy.com (imr4.ericy.com [198.24.6.8]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C0E3A6767 for <magma@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eusaamw0712.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.181]) by imr4.ericy.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id o9SN7Niw027738 for <magma@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:07:24 -0500
Received: from EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.63]) by eusaamw0712.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.181]) with mapi; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:46:52 -0400
From: Kunal Shah <kunal.shah@ericsson.com>
To: "magma@ietf.org" <magma@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:46:50 -0400
Thread-Topic: Question about fast-leave implementation
Thread-Index: Act28gKeg1WqzTs6TI21dKWgWWG0bQ==
Message-ID: <4FD1E7CD248BF84F86BD4814EDDDBCC150E72D5C2E@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4FD1E7CD248BF84F86BD4814EDDDBCC150E72D5C2EEUSAACMS0703e_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:13:28 -0700
Subject: [magma] Question about fast-leave implementation
X-BeenThere: magma@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast and Anycast Group Membership <magma.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma>, <mailto:magma-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/magma>
List-Post: <mailto:magma@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:magma-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma>, <mailto:magma-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:45:02 -0000
Hi all, Is there any reason to send out a query in fast-leave is enabled on the interface?? Enabling fast-leave allows deleting the cache immediately on receiving a leave. If the cache is deleted immediately, hosts on the interface will see traffic loss, which makes me think that fast-leave is enabled when the interface is gauranteed to receive a leave when the last host goes away or there is only one host on the interface. So does it make any sense in sending out a query on receiving a leave if fast-leave is enabled?? Thanks Kunal
- [magma] Question about fast-leave implementation Kunal Shah
- Re: [magma] Question about fast-leave implementat… Beeram, Suresh KumarReddy
- Re: [magma] Question about fast-leave implementat… Hitoshi Asaeda