Re: [magma] Learning dynamic mrouter when both IGMP and snooping are enabled
Indranil Bhattacharya <myselfindranil@gmail.com> Fri, 10 February 2012 08:33 UTC
Return-Path: <myselfindranil@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: magma@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: magma@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACAB121F85F9 for <magma@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:33:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.178
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.178 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.180, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_75=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1RKpfNQS1sp1 for <magma@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:33:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC28921F85E3 for <magma@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:33:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vbbfr13 with SMTP id fr13so1926560vbb.31 for <magma@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:33:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=r998drSJpBLExRX73Sda9LRBVzCrYI9+xRiXPMc9kc0=; b=oK3c8Ld44Cya6o4ZxlDzkc5uak0cX32srY4wCe7XRVQin+EMAN6ppTfG3twLQ2fMVo XD0ZCf/3cro11Bp/dwt3My30b7K+Ya2vgtTx4mJz4K41LgjIoTuFBxQm0CZg6AIBWMlR hXrc84h7VBdS8kJu0M0q9ArKfhj2YuDuWmdK4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.107.15 with SMTP id z15mr2618284vco.19.1328862786435; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:33:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.7.70 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:33:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAFZOH7JfkJD=agsWACPD57ir3Hb5XMoEtQSHAhz8tcSV5=ggTg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFZOH7JfkJD=agsWACPD57ir3Hb5XMoEtQSHAhz8tcSV5=ggTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:03:06 +0530
Message-ID: <CAAaur9523Z5HHvrMQdBzRHga1FV1-4s2k35SxvE8GTkbdNv83w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Indranil Bhattacharya <myselfindranil@gmail.com>
To: sudhanshu kumar <sudhanshu22@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d043c7ba4573a5b04b897fad1"
Cc: magma@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [magma] Learning dynamic mrouter when both IGMP and snooping are enabled
X-BeenThere: magma@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast and Anycast Group Membership <magma.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/magma>, <mailto:magma-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/magma>
List-Post: <mailto:magma@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:magma-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma>, <mailto:magma-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:33:07 -0000
Hi Sudhanshu,
Yes you should learn mrouter port via Query and PIM
Hello even when IGMP(PIM) and snooping are both enabled. The learnt mrouter
ports should only be used for forwarding control packets and not data
packets. If only IGMP Snooping is enabled then we should forward data on
mrouter ports.
Thanks,
Indranil
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:13 AM, sudhanshu kumar <sudhanshu22@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi,
> If we have enabled both IGMP and IGMP snooping, and we receive query from
> a neighbor, should we always create the dynamic mrouter(since snooping is
> enabled).
>
> Thanks,
> Sudhanshu
>
> _______________________________________________
> magma mailing list
> magma@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma
>
>
- [magma] Learning dynamic mrouter when both IGMP a… sudhanshu kumar
- Re: [magma] Learning dynamic mrouter when both IG… Indranil Bhattacharya