[magma] Querier transition based on Group Specific Query?
Indranil Bhattacharya <myselfindranil@gmail.com> Tue, 31 January 2012 03:26 UTC
Return-Path: <myselfindranil@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: magma@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: magma@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9084721F8766 for <magma@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:26:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hizqm6Xaup4Y for <magma@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:26:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF53F11E80B4 for <magma@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:26:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vbbfr13 with SMTP id fr13so3601214vbb.31 for <magma@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:26:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=tRAm/l43/HkVqvZwb6SL0y3QKj0/yzzZ1ycd+s+0lXw=; b=F+RTxoTWGMvrxkWy6OKpuhZzXRyyEucfEPi5K1vxkJsXjjJhWJ+3vHF6ZNcLgpLNtZ ljLqpcVwIZTgPD+MJodzneOivV2AAZk2L8SpPWpirTu942biVYwVEUyUGwlCMgVE7nuH OTEqVAp0Q58g/tkoWYxY/jCHNGiIS41eEhZO0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.70.146 with SMTP id m18mr9340231vdu.127.1327980410970; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:26:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.7.70 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:26:50 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:56:50 +0530
Message-ID: <CAAaur95C6wF7FmQhyPhd-bZKU7VGK5oozbLwkZxC8Mx89Qq9-A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Indranil Bhattacharya <myselfindranil@gmail.com>
To: magma@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf307f3714aa22e504b7ca883e"
Subject: [magma] Querier transition based on Group Specific Query?
X-BeenThere: magma@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast and Anycast Group Membership <magma.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/magma>, <mailto:magma-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/magma>
List-Post: <mailto:magma@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:magma-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma>, <mailto:magma-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:26:52 -0000
> > Hi, > > In the querier transition state machine, RFC 2236 only mentions 'Query' > and does not specify GQ or GSQ. Can a querier transition take place based > on GSQ? Or is it okay to for a querier to ignore GSQ? Can anyone please > help me with this? > > Thanks, > Indranil >
- [magma] Querier transition based on Group Specifi… Indranil Bhattacharya
- Re: [magma] Querier transition based on Group Spe… Kudachi, Deepak S
- Re: [magma] Querier transition based on Group Spe… Bharat Joshi
- Re: [magma] Querier transition based on Group Spe… Indranil Bhattacharya
- Re: [magma] Querier transition based on Group Spe… Indranil Bhattacharya
- Re: [magma] Querier transition based on Group Spe… Bharat Joshi
- Re: [magma] Querier transition based on Group Spe… Indranil Bhattacharya
- Re: [magma] Querier transition based on Group Spe… Bharat Joshi
- Re: [magma] Querier transition based on Group Spe… Bharat Joshi
- Re: [magma] Querier transition based on Group Spe… V, Magesh (Magesh)
- Re: [magma] Querier transition based on Group Spe… V, Magesh (Magesh)
- Re: [magma] Querier transition based on Group Spe… Bharat Joshi