Re: [magma] MLDv2 router in the presence of MLDv1 Multicast Address Listeners

"K.Kawaguchi" <kawaguti@ysknet.co.jp> Tue, 28 September 2010 06:42 UTC

Return-Path: <kawaguti@ysknet.co.jp>
X-Original-To: magma@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: magma@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06283A6B23 for <magma@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 23:42:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.205
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.205 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, RELAY_IS_203=0.994, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d8VmT1LkQKC7 for <magma@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 23:42:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tkns.tk.ysknet.co.jp (tkmx.tk.ysknet.co.jp [203.180.172.16]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 65D143A6C61 for <magma@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 23:42:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 21830 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2010 15:43:38 +0900
Received: from (HELO PrecisionM20) (@) by with SMTP; 28 Sep 2010 15:43:38 +0900
To: myselfindranil@gmail.com, kunal.shah@ericsson.com
From: "K.Kawaguchi" <kawaguti@ysknet.co.jp>
References: <20100927031621.00002421.0135@ysknet.co.jp> <AANLkTi=mK6sGJchnpM-FZBN40rEXa73Tih3ZF=24KouY@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=mK6sGJchnpM-FZBN40rEXa73Tih3ZF=24KouY@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <201009281542.GBB51531.ULJBVXHB@ysknet.co.jp>
X-Mailer: Winbiff [Version 2.51 PL2]
X-Accept-Language: ja,en,zh
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:42:51 +0900
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: magma@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [magma] MLDv2 router in the presence of MLDv1 Multicast Address Listeners
X-BeenThere: magma@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast and Anycast Group Membership <magma.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma>, <mailto:magma-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/magma>
List-Post: <mailto:magma@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:magma-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma>, <mailto:magma-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 06:42:17 -0000

Hi Indranil-san, Kunal-san,

Thank you for the answers.
I understood.

>                                 Yes, I would think so. Otherwise there is a
> possibility of some sources getting deleted. When MLDv1 receiver is present
> in the LAN, this will not be acceptable.

Best Regards
--
Kiyoaki Kawaguchi



"Indranil Bhattacharya <myselfindranil@gmail.com>" wrote:

> 
> Hi Kiyoaki Kawaguchi,
> 
>                                 Yes, I would think so. Otherwise there is a
> possibility of some sources getting deleted. When MLDv1 receiver is present
> in the LAN, this will not be acceptable.
> 
> Thanks,
> Indranil
> 
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:46 AM, K.Kawaguchi <kawaguti@ysknet.co.jp> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a simple question for MLDv2 interoperation with MLDv1.
> >
> >
> > RFC3810
> > ---
> > 8.3.  Multicast Router Behavior
> >
> > 8.3.2.  In the Presence of MLDv1 Multicast Address Listeners
> >
> >   MLDv2 BLOCK messages are ignored, as are source-lists in TO_EX()
> >   messages (i.e., any TO_EX() message is treated as TO_EX( {} )).  On
> >   the other hand, the Querier continues to send MLDv2 queries,
> >   regardless of its Multicast Address Compatibility Mode.
> > ---
> >
> >
> > Is the follwing a correct right too?
> >
> >   "Any IS_EX() message is treated as IS_EX( {} )."
> >
> >
> > Best Regards
> > --
> > Kiyoaki Kawaguchi
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > magma mailing list
> > magma@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
>