IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [magma] Destination address in v2 leave message

"Kudachi, Deepak S" <deepak.kudachi@hp.com> Fri, 14 October 2011 03:58 UTC

Return-Path: <deepak.kudachi@hp.com>
X-Original-To: magma@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: magma@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B07E21F8B70 for <magma@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 20:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tTHNL720D+iZ for <magma@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 20:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from g1t0029.austin.hp.com (g1t0029.austin.hp.com [15.216.28.36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE96821F8B53 for <magma@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 20:58:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from G6W1798G.americas.hpqcorp.net (g6w1798g.atlanta.hp.com [16.230.17.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by g1t0029.austin.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24DB938273; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 03:58:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from G4W3200G.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.234.105.236) by G6W1798G.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.230.17.175) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.289.1; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 03:56:39 +0000
Received: from G4W3218.americas.hpqcorp.net ([169.254.10.199]) by G4W3200G.americas.hpqcorp.net ([16.234.105.236]) with mapi id 14.01.0289.001; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 03:56:38 +0000
From: "Kudachi, Deepak S" <deepak.kudachi@hp.com>
To: Indranil Bhattacharya <myselfindranil@gmail.com>, Kunal Shah <kunal.shah@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [magma] Destination address in v2 leave message
Thread-Index: AQHMic3S15a2BsO/t068aNHNr/84BJV6lVmAgAAmZoCAAHo9kA==
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 03:56:37 +0000
Message-ID: <A73087BEA2747741B7965ACF956E5004036635@G4W3218.americas.hpqcorp.net>
References: <CAAaur97Rhfy5=SYsji8appmHcesVQzOP8y_X2sFkUnw7ZQmGLg@mail.gmail.com> <4FD1E7CD248BF84F86BD4814EDDDBCC151402959E6@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se> <CAAaur97X9p5TUR6nwhL3V09Dtp4L+BxOQoHWnuaLXwyeUXBvyg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAaur97X9p5TUR6nwhL3V09Dtp4L+BxOQoHWnuaLXwyeUXBvyg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [16.216.12.10]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A73087BEA2747741B7965ACF956E5004036635G4W3218americashp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "magma@ietf.org" <magma@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [magma] Destination address in v2 leave message
X-BeenThere: magma@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast and Anycast Group Membership <magma.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/magma>, <mailto:magma-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/magma>
List-Post: <mailto:magma@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:magma-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma>, <mailto:magma-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 03:58:18 -0000

Hi kunal,

If you are tracking querier's then I guess there should not be any issue in sending it
Towards querier only.

Again it is implementation dependent.

Thanks and Regards
Deepak

From: magma-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:magma-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Indranil Bhattacharya
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 2:06 AM
To: Kunal Shah
Cc: magma@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [magma] Destination address in v2 leave message

Hi Kunal,

            Non-queriers lower the group timers upon receiving group-specific query from querier. They always ignore leave messages. Please refer the last state diagram in section 7 which is for non-querier.

Thanks,
Indranil
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Kunal Shah <kunal.shah@ericsson.com<mailto:kunal.shah@ericsson.com>> wrote:
Non-querier does process the leave message. On receiving a leave the non-querier is going to reduce the group timer to [Max Response Time] in the packet * [Last Member Query Count] but will not send the leave. Please refer to section 7 of RFC 2236.

________________________________
From: magma-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:magma-bounces@ietf.org> [mailto:magma-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:magma-bounces@ietf.org>] On Behalf Of Indranil Bhattacharya
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 10:30 AM
To: magma@ietf.org<mailto:magma@ietf.org>
Subject: [magma] Destination address in v2 leave message
Hi,

    Can anyone please tell me the disadvantage of using queriers address as destination address in v2 leave message? Is there any advantage of sending it to 224.0.0.2? Non-querier never processes leave message anyway.

Thanks,
Indranil

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email