IETF Logo Mail Archive

[magma] Destination address in v2 leave message

Indranil Bhattacharya <myselfindranil@gmail.com> Thu, 13 October 2011 17:30 UTC

Return-Path: <myselfindranil@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: magma@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: magma@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB8B21F8B4A for <magma@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.569
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.569 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.830, BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ips6hu0uJsrQ for <magma@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6FA21F87FA for <magma@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wyg24 with SMTP id 24so2400578wyg.31 for <magma@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MbkpbYSDFclDtIAKBYQd9kcPN+dmyK1PNhJZsu6ENro=; b=Z5aKU0K923sJ8fWvDFW2yHFR99DDZ4aFIUl9cirOQhk1VSaLcJEgRz3qm9zuhdlh/X UvhkhB5oim6PVKg7EV8zYWOzmCSnhlerUqpY3YSnVe2HmeJkxhKOffMRAhyfaDzA7fcU MJZNPN+LuP1DlCP0D8rbep3LQ069Oi85fKHik=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.24.2 with SMTP id w2mr1560495wew.49.1318527028087; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.39.80 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:00:27 +0530
Message-ID: <CAAaur97Rhfy5=SYsji8appmHcesVQzOP8y_X2sFkUnw7ZQmGLg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Indranil Bhattacharya <myselfindranil@gmail.com>
To: magma@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e642db9422ca1f04af317ff1"
Subject: [magma] Destination address in v2 leave message
X-BeenThere: magma@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast and Anycast Group Membership <magma.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/magma>, <mailto:magma-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/magma>
List-Post: <mailto:magma@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:magma-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma>, <mailto:magma-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:30:29 -0000

Hi,

    Can anyone please tell me the disadvantage of using queriers address as
destination address in v2 leave message? Is there any advantage of sending
it to 224.0.0.2? Non-querier never processes leave message anyway.

Thanks,
Indranil

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email