Re: [maitai] Roles of Sender and Receiver

<bruno.chatras@orange-ftgroup.com> Tue, 07 December 2010 08:47 UTC

Return-Path: <bruno.chatras@orange-ftgroup.com>
X-Original-To: maitai@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: maitai@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2EE3A6942 for <maitai@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 00:47:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xk46Y+L7Cfn8 for <maitai@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 00:47:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com [217.108.152.42]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137753A68C4 for <maitai@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 00:47:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 6ACDBFC400E; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 09:49:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.47]) by r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17ED1FC4002; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 09:49:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.56]) by ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 7 Dec 2010 09:49:19 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 09:49:18 +0100
Message-ID: <9ECCF01B52E7AB408A7EB853526421410242061C@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr>
In-Reply-To: <F7377176-D185-4FC6-B012-C776783D5871@magorcorp.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [maitai] Roles of Sender and Receiver
Thread-Index: AcuT0KCmSbafmJmxQtu/uo/o5/h3/gCF3IXw
References: <928969B1-F60B-47B8-A526-676E86BA7061@magorcorp.com><4CF9975D.4060903@cisco.com> <F7377176-D185-4FC6-B012-C776783D5871@magorcorp.com>
From: bruno.chatras@orange-ftgroup.com
To: peter.musgrave@magorcorp.com, pkyzivat@cisco.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Dec 2010 08:49:19.0767 (UTC) FILETIME=[A32CDA70:01CB95EB]
Cc: maitai@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [maitai] Roles of Sender and Receiver
X-BeenThere: maitai@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-stream Attributes for Improving Telepresence Application Interoperability <maitai.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/maitai>, <mailto:maitai-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/maitai>
List-Post: <mailto:maitai@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:maitai-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/maitai>, <mailto:maitai-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 08:47:57 -0000

> 
> In fact in the first exchange we also need to provide some 
> information about media asymmetry (e.g. I may have three 
> screens, but 4 cameras or three screens and two cameras). so 
> my video m lines do not necessarily imply anything my ability 
> to send that many videos....
> 

Why can't we use one m= line per unidirectional stream and use
a=sendonly/a=recvonly to discrimate between screens and cameras?