IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [manet-dlep-rg] Latency

Henning Rogge <hrogge@googlemail.com> Tue, 12 November 2013 13:23 UTC

Return-Path: <hrogge@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028CB11E8162 for <manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 05:23:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.963
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.963 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.015, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0EzBInyfjmur for <manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 05:23:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qe0-x22a.google.com (mail-qe0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC6511E813D for <manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 05:23:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qe0-f42.google.com with SMTP id df13so2288273qeb.1 for <manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 05:23:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=Ql1QcYghxP7vy27uPwTPhkEE6P0uSHCgqRVw9IjGfYY=; b=BsA/n+py1fZ+9Xa1zeU5/2ps1rfv84BmgfIV/MSTGl+w4QeFphVt8JzQ5/PRmBXQYl WRRPq2RirqMGV3gBFXsrWV7KfyRszkV0fvxR5IR6H9s/BfmaLjKYTr7lQlO66V3kAQzH ycJXub7fMuMbaotrpYuh9/mumNqc4pheCAuKsGcvbyHL9siPFlua2G2o4fGKMsp7Nsf4 5nLU5Abmiye8UzyawCKQmQW1D41pX6Jkh0FepCI3yqCAJgY9SUYXfVH0xsO9q+YXB/Dt aIPEtKz51VbcFwviHt3vi4TCDi2WYxDspohrBgGXh3rGoGhre5G519oIW2n0pg0Suz21 bIGA==
X-Received: by 10.49.133.129 with SMTP id pc1mr56545009qeb.44.1384262584746; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 05:23:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.36.200 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 05:22:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <032D6BF0-5B60-489D-8BC5-9634BEDDBC9F@inf-net.nl>
References: <72FB622921C13746AD6349E70A8D9F307D9192F7@EXC-MBX03.tsn.tno.nl> <CAK=bVC85XAXR3Zkwq+JwELF-dvgrKwbowWCvwvnjeVn7VStnbw@mail.gmail.com> <72FB622921C13746AD6349E70A8D9F307D9193CD@EXC-MBX03.tsn.tno.nl> <5A8A5085482DA84995F4E70F5093AB50268E6C@XCH-BLV-503.nw.nos.boeing.com> <B2BA430A-F4E6-4DED-A7BB-7282A22802B7@inf-net.nl> <D02397F1-9D1B-4B36-81D0-4585ACDBA34A@gmail.com> <5D184300-2D97-4EC1-8D91-76D4A79B2BDA@inf-net.nl> <DDAE98C5-520E-4F8F-9F9B-2AB9A15A70EF@cisco.com> <032D6BF0-5B60-489D-8BC5-9634BEDDBC9F@inf-net.nl>
From: Henning Rogge <hrogge@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:22:44 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGnRvurMENkKdFL9Vhc-=-84p=yg8pNMEz-YpVdtMeiJDhdQ4Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "DLEP Research Group (manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org)" <manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>, Stan Ratliff <sratliff@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [manet-dlep-rg] Latency
X-BeenThere: manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DLEP Radio Group <manet-dlep-rg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet-dlep-rg>, <mailto:manet-dlep-rg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet-dlep-rg>
List-Post: <mailto:manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-dlep-rg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dlep-rg>, <mailto:manet-dlep-rg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 13:23:06 -0000

Yes, I heard this too in the MANET Meeting...

which made me wonder a bit because I was puzzled what was the
difference between the two.

Can maybe the people who already have an implementation for DLEP tell
us what kind of Latency they implemented?

Henning Rogge

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl> wrote:
>
> Op 11 nov. 2013, om 01:55 heeft Stan Ratliff (sratliff) <sratliff@cisco.com> het volgende geschreven:
>
>> Point 11 - I didn't hear that. Really, I didn't hear any conclusions about Latency. Other opinions?
>
> We discussed it and all speakers said it is an important metric, so it will be an optional TLV in core document.
>
> Wasn't Henning tasked with verifying Latency and EFT?
>
> Teco
>
> _______________________________________________
> manet-dlep-rg mailing list
> manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dlep-rg



-- 
We began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still. We have lingered
long enough on the shores of the cosmic ocean. We are ready at last to
set sail for the stars - Carl Sagan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email