Re: [manet-dlep-rg] Example: TCP server on satcom modem

Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl> Fri, 22 November 2013 18:13 UTC

Return-Path: <teco@inf-net.nl>
X-Original-To: manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24521AC7F0 for <manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:13:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t6KUFgPBPU8T for <manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:13:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ea0-f169.google.com (mail-ea0-f169.google.com [209.85.215.169]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F0E1AD959 for <manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:13:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ea0-f169.google.com with SMTP id l9so683854eaj.0 for <manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:13:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=3soafNurntzz7EVDJuchNq5m/0lWoGPIUGegYW/gh1E=; b=PjHxHTNo1QFSNbLgCxfv7W0beiI+Z0Anz45YxdxXy65vaI6WZAOlDf4eyycZV+5/oG ORss4lRh/848Y2jijRrfLB2wpNcSW23016g9uZDX9xS9eNP2TDH5daiG85ouKk9kY8td Dsx8brSIMBo4Mrvn8bCoBSsH/3hDhGmY9RlY+n2rYVPRUWHGBcNLd3DiMp2lOHcx8liZ Esczm70GU006uE9Tl4rm0GQm3zzlMAgeBT8sfiNq58DaTrxgZ0VzJGJTQlBEc2MuYlZz g16s2Bc68UlX++qp4Nc0RQn8fmuO+VF4lFuq1OfiwAKtcFbUZLf75ymcgX7uBNThYK3p CbhQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlzYn4Qam20dyMy7N6ShLaiXX4kIeF6TRAPlBxjq4bBEHqtMMUIYN73S/GZnHtzc7coZfYL
X-Received: by 10.14.241.76 with SMTP id f52mr3925980eer.53.1385143984535; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:13:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.175.173.95] (524A14A4.cm-4-3a.dynamic.ziggo.nl. [82.74.20.164]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h8sm79577632eew.16.2013.11.22.10.13.01 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:13:02 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
From: Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl>
In-Reply-To: <6621D616-E902-4135-910C-06F0C2644BA6@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 19:13:19 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D25866CA-CBB6-4A66-996B-8903355EF7EF@inf-net.nl>
References: <42E5DED5-98E2-4A56-9348-AED15A5F513F@cisco.com> <27434E92-CF57-4469-99F1-D8A27A4E20D9@inf-net.nl> <6621D616-E902-4135-910C-06F0C2644BA6@cisco.com>
To: Stan Ratliff <sratliff@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
Cc: "\(manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org\) manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org Group" <manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [manet-dlep-rg] Example: TCP server on satcom modem
X-BeenThere: manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DLEP Radio Group <manet-dlep-rg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet-dlep-rg>, <mailto:manet-dlep-rg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet-dlep-rg/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-dlep-rg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dlep-rg>, <mailto:manet-dlep-rg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:13:15 -0000

>> Multiple connections can be same source, same destination. Think of NAT. Interfaces on my routers pointing towards Internet have NAT.
> 
> While multiple connections on a telnet server makes sense, I don't think multiple connections makes sense on DLEP. 

For your router: I understand.
DLEP is definitely not *only* for routers. I don't mind, the nodes I have t deal with do DTN kind of things; they forward messages. Multiple of those nodes share same radio. Radio has the capabilities, e.g. the PS radio's definitely do. Same for BGAN units. My list in longer.

Teco